Reengineering Principles
The standard Reengineering principles are as follows -
1. Organize work around its end results, not tasks
According to this principle, it is optimal to determine the work’s end result rather than dividing the work into small tasks & units. We try to rearrange the work process so that a single person can perform all the steps involved. This eliminates wastage of time due to trailing of work processes through many hands and also puts workers in control of processes. Organizing work around end results reduces the number of intermediate levels of approvals and assign a single concerned personnel to perform all the tasks.
2. Capture data only once when it is first created
According to this principle, the company shall capture & store data only one time when it is first created. In other words, the should avoid redundant data. The company should avoid accepting the same data via input forms that has already being entered in the enterprise database. The use of IT enabled systems such the EDI systems, OLT systems DSS, data warehousing systems EIS etc will help to setup the appropriate information management system for the enterprise that deals with data consistency, integrity, correctness and avoiding data redundancy.
3. Allow decision points where work is performed
In usual work setups, the processes are completely controlled by the managers and supervisors. This often fasten hierarchical management structures. The actual doers are assumed to lack the knowledge or responsibility o take a process to completion. The reengineered process argues that the people who actually do the work should be the ones to make many of the decisions about it, and that the controls over the decisions should be built into the systems that workers use.
Such an approach to work will reduce layers of organizational bureaucracy and changes the roles of workers and supervisors. It empowers the doers to better control their own work environment.
4. Incorporate controls into information processing
While reengineering a business process, we allow the people who collect the information to process the information too. Such controls are incorporated to the information processing system in such a way that usually a single computer could process and store all the related information of a process. The single computer shall process all the data in seconds and at a single location, thus avoiding the process to stretch along the various functions. Now, the person handling the computer system is responsible for the whole process and usually this change in responsibility is a boon to efficiency. Instead of allowing a discrepancy to pass through to several people within an organization, it can be stopped at the source.
5. Make people who use a process do the work
Over specialized and complex processes brings in bureaucracies and will cause people to spend undue time and energy following company policies and strict functional approaches rather than common sense. Make people who use a process do the work means that the reengineered process lets users get their own supplies and information by building controls into the system. If, for eg:, the accounting department requires some stationary items, it should not have to go to another department to administer the process. Instead, the purchasing group shall setup master accounts in a computer system to deal with any sort of purchasing in any other departments indirectly via distributed computer applications and this allow the accounts department to buy the stationary by itself and get the necessary data updated in the purchasing department’s master account.
6. Work in parallel instead of sequentially and later integrate the results
Reengineered business setup enables multiple work projects to be handled in parallel so that the individual projects are linked & coordinated in such a way that the end product development is accelerated without any breakup in between. Reengineering enabled by IT solutions such as the enterprise wide intranets, CAD/CAM systems, manufacturing automation systems, ERP systems, EDI systems, work group internet works etc, supports this work in parallel and integrate results methodology.
7. Treat geographically dispersed resources as one
According to this reengineering principle, the reengineered system will enable the enterprise to integrate the geographically separated resources (man, machine, money, information) and provide a centralized control over these resources. Consider the case of enterprise’s information management setup in the reengineered system. The enterprise wide intranet integrates the distributed data sources and data stores by allowing data sharing, peer-to-peer communication between data applications and a centralized control over the intranet by the IT department. When we take the case of the workforce, we may integrate the workforce of the enterprise towards the common goal of the enterprise by enabling the workers to interact with each other and with the related process via the intranet.
Shared databases, telecommunication networks and standardized processing systems now make it possible to gain the benefits of scale and centralization while maintaining the advantages of the flexibility and service that come from being dispersed and close to the customer.
Categories: Business and Management, Information Management, Process Improvement, Reengineering, Uncategorized Tags:
Why Companies Do Reengineering?
Companies are doing reengineering since they want to remain stable in the dynamic business environment while facing changing strategies, financial crisis due to weak / poor / outdated business processes, technological changes, change in customer demands & business competition. Everyone is going for reengineering since it usually provides a quick fix for the present problem by a suitable business transformation. Everyone has great aspirations while reengineering one’s business, since reengineering surely brings out various potential benefits that usually breakeven the costs of reengineering. The following are the potential benefits brought about by reengineering that inspires every business enterprise to go for it.
Benefit level 1: Provides a quick fix for the present problem
Benefit level 2: Business processes are refined according to the improved strategies
Benefit level 3: Refined business processes creates high quality products & services, reduced paperwork, reduced manual labor and reduced process cycle times.
Benefit level 4: The above benefit creates high quality and value added products and services shipped to the customers in time. This improves customer satisfaction and customer support. The company now tends to care more for its customers.
Benefit level 5: Cash flow is improved which leads to easy realization of ROI and business profits and gains.
Benefit level 6: This leads to business prosperity and stability.
Article Copyright – Deepesh Joseph (2010)
Categories: Business and Management, Information Architecture, Information Management, Process Improvement, Reengineering Tags:
Reengineering an accounts payable function
Consider the case of approving a loan application. In the manual process, it takes 6 persons and considerable amount of time to accept the details, calculating risks and repayment capabilities and letting the application trail through hands of various functional levels. But, when we reengineer the above process, the whole process may be converted to a PC based applications handled by a single person who performs the formal dealings with the customer & inputs the details on the computer generated form. All further, calculations and checking & further approval of the loan is made by the computer by checking various records of the customer. Here, the reengineered business system is process based since all the trailing levels are capsulated into a single person to perform the process. The benefits of reengineered process lies in the customer satisfaction, reduced business process cycle time, reduced manual labor, reduced paper work and reduced number of persons to perform / complete the process.
Thus, BPR has various potential benefits that leads to long term business stability and process refinements. This prompts every business enterprise to go for BPR when it requires to change its business strategies due to changing customer demands, financial crisis, technological changes and business competition.
Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2011
Categories: Business and Management, Process Improvement, Reengineering Tags:
Creating Process based Organizations via Reegineering
While reengineering a business enterprise, we create a process based organization structure for the enterprise to avoid the inefficiencies and time wasting business process cycles as in a functions based organization. ie – the business process information systems and the enterprise wide information infrastructure are integrated in such a way that the people of various functions or departments could easily form teams for related activities and project works. Such a process based system enables faster business process cycles, workflows and data flows that creates a total quality business setup. The business enterprise is now able to produce its products and services faster and with added value to satisfy its customers.
Often, when we reengineer a business enterprise, a process that took 3 days and 6 persons to get completed, will require say only a single person and a PC and say only 2 hrs to finish the process with all formalities satisfying the business rules.
Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2011
Categories: Business and Management, Information Management, Organizational Change, Process Improvement, Reengineering, Strategic Planning Tags:
Basic approaches to Reengineering
The three basic approaches to reengineering are as follows -
1. STREAMLIING
2. INTEGRATING
3. TRANSFORMING
1. Streamlining – Streamlining approach to reengineering the business offers a basic, segmented, quick-fix methodology for reengineering. It cleans up and treats symptoms but doesn’t necessarily transform a process nor find a cure for a bad process. It doesn’t change the way a company conducts its core business nor does it impose whether certain processes should exist at all. For eg: while reengineering an accounts payable process, we may reduce the staffs from the existing number to 7. If we follow a thorough transformation approach, this would require total number of 17 sign offs. The streamlining approach of reengineering the accounts payable process may also increase the level of spending authorization for managers. Another approach would be to translate the current workflow and dataflow via electronic means such as EDI. In essence, the streamlining approach to reengineering is simple, functional and makes operations go faster or better.
2. Integrating – The integrating approach to reengineering integrates discrete business processes, replacing them with a unified process that frequently cut across functions and department responsibilities i.e, it creates a process based organization of workflows within the reengineered process. For eg:, when we reengineer a sample business process that formerly required the functional trailing of workflows among various departments such as accounting, purchasing and warehousing, we re-order the workflows so that the individual functions are closely related by reducing redundancies, cycle-times and unnecessary retention of separate receiving logs and lists of prices. Now, the reengineered process will cut across all the functions and will now require only lesser number of persons and manual labor and lesser process cycle times to perform the tasks. But when we consider the business as a whole, the reengineering by integrating has only changed the accounts payable process, but it doesn’t change the way the enterprise produced / manufactured products nor does it directly affect other major functions of the enterprise, but it has a profound influence on the jobs of the people performing the accounts payable process.
3. Transforming - Transforming approach to reengineering transforms the company as a whole. When such an organizational transformation is carried out, the projects should get complete commitment and sponsorship from the top management and support from the working staff. New strategies, policies, objectives and plans will have to be devised to effect the complete transformation. The enterprise shall search for the appropriate technology and workflows to setup the transformed system. The company shall benchmark its existing system with that of another similar company which has already applied reengineering in its system. The company shall seek help from IT consultants to bring in the right infrastructure and IT solutions.
Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2011
Categories: Business and Management, Information Management, Organizational Change, Process Improvement, Reengineering, Strategic Planning Tags:
Basic steps in Business Process Reengineering
We can generalize Business Process Reengineering (BPR) efforts as an eight step process as follow -
Step 1: Formulate / Modify business visions, policies, objectives
Step 2: Formulate / Modify business strategies according to changing customer requirements, technology changes and competition
Step 3: Analyze the existing business process cycles & workflows and determine how they may be modified or refined
Step 4: Apply IT to setup an optimal Business Information Management Architecture (BIMA) to support the reengineered business process
Step 5: Modify or redesign the existing processes according to the reengineering strategies and develop refined Business Process Automation Systems (BPAS)
Step 6: Apply IT strategies to map BIMA onto an Enterprise Information Management System (EIMS) that is integrated across the enterprise and that fits into and supports the reengineered Business process cycles and workflows.
Step 7: Integrate the EIMS with the BPAS to build up the completed reengineered business system
Step 8: Repeat steps 1-7 for continuous BPR due to changing customer demands, technology changes and business strategies, which leads to business stability
Since information management is a key factor in BPR, the BPR efforts are enabled & supported by a variety of IT solutions.
Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2011
Categories: Business and Management, Process Improvement, Reengineering Tags:
What is Re-engineering? Why companies are doing re-engineering?
Re-engineering or Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) is way of rethinking or redesigning the existing business systems both in technical and behavioral terms. The ultimate goal of BPR is to continuously improve the business process cycles so that a total quality is built to the business system, its processes & workflows that reflects as high quality products & services produced by the enterprise. As quality products and services are provided by the enterprise for its customers, customers are able to gain value for the products and services that they buy. This improves customer satisfaction and customer orders. This further improves cash flows and easy realization of business profits and gains.
Now, since BPR leads to continuous business process improvements, the business process cycles and workflows are continuously refined according to changing strategies, technologies and customer demands. This ultimately leads to business stability in the competitive industry / business environment. Since every enterprise is striving for business stability, everyone is going for BPR.
BPR involves considering everything from business strategies to processes to organization structures to management systems (people, machine, money, information) to values & beliefs of the enterprise that undergoes BPR.
Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2011
Categories: Business and Management, Enterprise Architecture, Reengineering, Strategic Planning Tags:
Mind Mapping technique to prepare WBS
I would prefer the mind mapping technique to arrive at WBS (work break down structure), due to my liking for problem solving by visualization and modeling techniques. Another reason to like that technique is that it is very much similar to various modeling tools that we use during the System Analysis phase of product development and I have been closely working in this area. I would compare mind mapping method of creating WBS to preparing a context diagram. Just like a context diagram forms the basis for the high level and detail level data flows, a mind map forms the basis for high level and detailed level tasks. One great advantage of mind mapping model is that they account for easy translation to structure and plan since they work similar to translating our thoughts into sensible actions.
I haven’t personally used mind mapping since I haven’t prepared an official WBS on any project. However I sometimes use mind mapping technique for my own scheduling.
Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2010
Categories: Business and Management, Information Management, Knowledge Management, Process Improvement, Project Management, Reengineering Tags:
Strategic alignment of IT resources – A case study in Grocery industry (Part 2)
Strategic alignment of IT resources – A case study in Grocery industry (Part 2)
|
Japan |
UK |
Spain |
US |
|
|
Effect of economic situation |
The effect of recession has prompted Japanese to be |
Consumers have scaled back spending and repaid debt |
Recession has its impacts on buying habits on |
Currently, there is high trends |
|
Technology & Infrastructure Issues |
Concerns that old style of doing business is not |
Robust private markets for technology and services. |
Innovation system |
Major technology thrust pushes industry to take |
|
Integration Issues |
System integration issues due to heavy mergers |
Applications developers must understand retailers’ |
Severe integration issues in supply chain. |
Major challenge is integration issues while |
|
Japan |
UK |
Spain |
US |
|
|
Political Structure |
A parliamentary government with a constitutional |
Constitutional monarchy and Commonwealth realm (50). |
Basque Nationalist Party , Canarian Convergence and |
Even though current US political setup and |
|
Legislation |
In 2006, the Internet providers attempted to |
Growing dominance of large grocery chains prompted |
Education expenditures |
Current US administration has put forth various |
|
Trade Policy |
Japan’s weighted average tariff rate was 1.3 percent |
The Bank of England periodically coordinates |
Spain’s trade policy |
US trade policies are designed to support grocery |
Porter’s Competitive Forces Model
Dominant Blueprints & Strategic Focus
Blueprint (Drivers & Constraints)
|
Blueprint |
Force |
Japan |
UK |
Spain |
US |
|
Multi-Channel Easy To Do Business With |
Driver |
Acquisition |
Growing |
Efficiency |
Technology/Innovation |
|
Constraint |
Shortage |
Ordering |
Today, |
Convincing |
|
|
Spend Management Low Cost |
Driver |
The |
Spend |
Spend |
Economic |
|
Constraint |
Recession |
Cash |
Mega-Hubs were launched with promise to provide |
Walmart’s efforts to align IT to |
|
|
Employee
Productivity Multiplier |
Driver |
A |
Respecting |
Integrating |
Increased |
|
Constraint |
Regulations, |
Data Protection Act, |
For |
Severe |
|
Blueprint |
Force |
Japan |
UK |
Spain |
US |
|
Supply Management Fast & Responsive Service |
Driver |
The smaller supermarket chains around the country |
Tesco uses RFID tags on milk and DVDs to track |
Grocery retailers such as Asda |
Early |
|
Constraint |
focused (42).
|
Shorter order times, faster payment, interaction by |
ERP does not as of yet have a dominant industry |
The |
|
|
Product Innovation Product Innovation |
Driver |
Health is a key factor in determining customers’ |
Introducing private label goods as a way to provide |
CAD application resulted in an explosion of digital increasingly difficult to effectively |
One |
|
Constraint |
According to GNX’s VP of |
Grocery stores can provide aggregated customer data |
By the 1990’s, industry demanded more sophisticated |
Full |
Countries Position in Blueprint Evolution
Summaries, Interpretations, and Lessons Learned
•Customer’s are time-consciousness and demand power to establish preferences and satisfaction level has an ever increasing influence on the development and acceptance of multi-channel blueprints.
•Spend management is an essential dimension in business intelligence solutions, enabling better visibility into factors influencing strategic decisions.
•Leading grocery companies have invested enormous time and capital into aligning IT and business processes by standardizing applications.
•Retailers in the grocery industry search for innovative and efficient ways to integrate and standardize supply chain management by leveraging available IT resources to reinforce their business processes.
Conclusion
•Technology and innovation infusion has a positive impact on companies to quickly devise methods to establish effective means to perform sales promotions, improve customer service, provide easier and efficient tracking of products and supply chain management, and cut across multiple channels.
•Leading grocery retailers are distinguished by their significant attention to—and investment in—aligning people, processes and technology.
•To gain competitive advantage, retailers, manufacturers and wholesalers look for ways to reduce costs and improve response time by improving and standardizing their business processes.
•The major influences in the usage of product innovation blueprint are brand focus & subsequent differentiation and the strive towards effective means of product life cycle visualizations and subsequent IT alignment in satisfying a powerful customer.
References
. Gottlieb M. S. (2006). Grocery Stores- An Industry Study. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://www.msgcpa.com/files/Grocery.pdf.
2. Martinez S., Kaufman P. (n.d.) Twenty Years of Competition Reshape the U.S. Food Marketing System. Retrieved on February 14, 2010 from http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/April08/Features/FoodMarketing.htm.
3. SAS.com. (2008). SAS® Solutions for the grocery industry. Retrieved on February 14, 2010 from
http://www.sas.com/resources/brochure/sas-solutions-for-grocery-industry-overview.pdf.
4. Carlo J. (2009). Supermarket Pharmacy Trends. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://www.gmdc.org/assets/pdf/hbw09_business_session_supermarket_pharmacy_trends.pdf.
5. PollackAssociates (2002). Supermarket Technology. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://www.supermarketalert.com/pdf%20docs/2Techology.pdf.
6. Innovation America (2009). New Model of Governance of American Innovation. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.innovationamerica.us/index.php/inthenews/bendis-ia-in-the-news/1191-new-model-of-governance-of-american-Innovation.
7. Neilson News. (2009). New Product Innovation In A Recession: More Challenges, But Opportunities Remain. Retrieved on April15th from
8. cspa.org (2010). Industry Calls on Congress for Stakeholder Process to Modernize Outdated Chemical Law. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.cspa.org/infocenter/2010/03/industry-calls-on-congress-for-stakeholder-process-to-modernize-outdated-chemical-law/.
9. Mangaraj S. and Senauer B. (2008). A segmentation analysis of US grocery stores. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/14328/1/tr01-08.pdf
10. Imlay T. (May, 2006). Challenges in Today’s U.S. Supermarket Industry. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
. Martinez S., Kaufman P. (n.d.) Twenty Years of Competition Reshape the U.S. Food Marketing System. Retrieved on February 14, 20 from http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/April08/Features/FoodMarketing.htm
12. Kaarst-Brown M.L. (2005). Understanding an organization’s view of the CIO: The role of assumptions about IT. MIS Quarterly Executive
Vol. 4 No. 2 / June 2005
13. Pearlson K. E., Saunders C.S. (2008). Managing and using information systems. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
14. Kalakota R., Robinson M. (2003). services Blueprint – Road map for execution. Addison Wesly
15. Puciarelli J.C. (n.d.) Coping with the ” New Normal” ― How the Changed Economy Is Shaping IT Practices. on March 5th from
http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/ content/assets/newnormal.pdf
16. Andreine, D. (2008, October). Multi-Channel Integration Strategies and Environmental Aspects: A Conceptual Framework In Retailing.
Retrieved on 25th Feb, from http://www.gcbe.us/8th_GCBE/data/Daniela%20Andreini.doc
17. sas.com (n.d.). SAS solutions for Grocery Industry. Retrieved on 25 February 2010 from http://www.sas.com/resources/brochure/sas-solutions-for-grocery-industry-overview.pdf.
18. Zahey, D.L. (n.d.). Challenges and Solutions in Multi Channel Retailing. Retrieved on 25 February 2010 from http://www.junctionsolutions.com/programs/Challenges.pdf.
19. Carlo J. (2009). Supermarket Pharmacy Trends. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://www.gmdc.org/assets/pdf/hbw09_business_session_supermarket_pharmacy_trends.pdf.
20. Slovenia, B. (2004, June). Developing a framework for multi-channel strategies – An analysis of cases from the Grocery Retail Industry. Retrieved on 25th Feb, from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/2365947/Developing-A-Framework-For-Multi-Channel-Strategies-%EF%BF%BD-An- Analysis
21. PayStreamAdvisors (2010). Retrieved on March 5th from http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/content/assets/whitepaper_
eINV-Adoption-Ariba_673.pdf
. Gottlieb M. S. (2006). Grocery Stores- An Industry Study. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://www.msgcpa.com/files/Grocery.pdf.
2. Martinez S., Kaufman P. (n.d.) Twenty Years of Competition Reshape the U.S. Food Marketing System. Retrieved on February 14, 2010 from http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/April08/Features/FoodMarketing.htm.
3. SAS.com. (2008). SAS® Solutions for the grocery industry. Retrieved on February 14, 2010 from
http://www.sas.com/resources/brochure/sas-solutions-for-grocery-industry-overview.pdf.
4. Carlo J. (2009). Supermarket Pharmacy Trends. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://www.gmdc.org/assets/pdf/hbw09_business_session_supermarket_pharmacy_trends.pdf.
5. PollackAssociates (2002). Supermarket Technology. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://www.supermarketalert.com/pdf%20docs/2Techology.pdf.
6. Innovation America (2009). New Model of Governance of American Innovation. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.innovationamerica.us/index.php/inthenews/bendis-ia-in-the-news/1191-new-model-of-governance-of-american-Innovation.
7. Neilson News. (2009). New Product Innovation In A Recession: More Challenges, But Opportunities Remain. Retrieved on April15th from
8. cspa.org (2010). Industry Calls on Congress for Stakeholder Process to Modernize Outdated Chemical Law. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.cspa.org/infocenter/2010/03/industry-calls-on-congress-for-stakeholder-process-to-modernize-outdated-chemical-law/.
9. Mangaraj S. and Senauer B. (2008). A segmentation analysis of US grocery stores. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/14328/1/tr01-08.pdf
10. Imlay T. (May, 2006). Challenges in Today’s U.S. Supermarket Industry. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479076.aspx
. Martinez S., Kaufman P. (n.d.) Twenty Years of Competition Reshape the U.S. Food Marketing System. Retrieved on February 14, 20 from http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/April08/Features/FoodMarketing.htm
12. Kaarst-Brown M.L. (2005). Understanding an organization’s view of the CIO: The role of assumptions about IT. MIS Quarterly Executive
Vol. 4 No. 2 / June 2005
13. Pearlson K. E., Saunders C.S. (2008). Managing and using information systems. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
14. Kalakota R., Robinson M. (2003). services Blueprint – Road map for execution. Addison Wesly
15. Puciarelli J.C. (n.d.) Coping with the ” New Normal” ― How the Changed Economy Is Shaping IT Practices. on March 5th from
http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/ content/assets/newnormal.pdf
16. Andreine, D. (2008, October). Multi-Channel Integration Strategies and Environmental Aspects: A Conceptual Framework In Retailing.
Retrieved on 25th Feb, from http://www.gcbe.us/8th_GCBE/data/Daniela%20Andreini.doc
17. sas.com (n.d.). SAS solutions for Grocery Industry. Retrieved on 25 February 2010 from http://www.sas.com/resources/brochure/sas-solutions-for-grocery-industry-overview.pdf.
18. Zahey, D.L. (n.d.). Challenges and Solutions in Multi Channel Retailing. Retrieved on 25 February 2010 from http://www.junctionsolutions.com/programs/Challenges.pdf.
19. Carlo J. (2009). Supermarket Pharmacy Trends. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://www.gmdc.org/assets/pdf/hbw09_business_session_supermarket_pharmacy_trends.pdf.
20. Slovenia, B. (2004, June). Developing a framework for multi-channel strategies – An analysis of cases from the Grocery Retail Industry. Retrieved on 25th Feb, from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/2365947/Developing-A-Framework-For-Multi-Channel-Strategies-%EF%BF%BD-An- Analysis
21. PayStreamAdvisors (2010). Retrieved on March 5th from http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/content/assets/whitepaper_
eINV-Adoption-Ariba_673.pdf
. Ariba.com (n.d). Next-Generation Spend Analysis: Beyond Commodity Classifications. Retrieved on March 5th from http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/content/assets/NextGenerationSpendAnalysis.pdf
23. Global Sourcing – Story 0904 (March, 2010). News Analysis: Where next for global sourcing? Retrieved on March 5th 2010, from http://www.procurementleaders.com/news/latestnews/0904-walmart-supply-chain/
24. Kiosk.com (n.d). Self-service kiosks for HR. Retrieved on 3rd April, 2010, from http://kiosk.com/downloads/KIOSK_HR_Service.pdf
25. D’Anna J. (2009). Brookshire Grocery Company – Automating and integrating HR processes. Retrieved on 3rd April 2010, from http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=7F248506905550A4188B61FB09F22A39826236B6EA2146527CB725D333B45D7B20ED77191A9627EA6371990543E5A9E6420244DE1870B8B4
26. Browna J.R. et. al. (2005). Supply chain management and the evolution of the “Big Middle”. Journal of retailing.
27. Byrnes J. (2003). Supply Chain Management in a Walmart World. Retrieved on March 26th 2010 from http://web.mit.edu/jlbyrnes/www/pdfs/Supply%20Chain%20Management%20in%20a%20Walmart%20World%20HB
28. Azzato M. (2009). 10 Steps to Maximize Store Brand Growth. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.agentrics.com/web/agentrics/10-steps-to-maximize-store-brand-growth2-25-10.
29. Austin N. (2006). Grocery Retail in Aisia-Pacific. Retrieved on 13 Feb, 2010 from http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/Grocery-retailing-in-Asia-Pacific.pdf.
30. Herbig, P. (1995). Marketing Japanese Style. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://www.greenwood.com/catalog/Q009.aspx.
31. Chida, N. (2004). Japan’s Seiyu reinventing itself using Wal-Mart best practices. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FNP/ is_23_43/ai_n8577546/.
32. M2 Presswire (2009). The Global Economic Crisis: The Impact On Consumer Attitudes & Behaviors In Japan. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://www.just-food.com/store/product.aspx?id=79056.
. Rissanen, J. and Viitanen, J. (2001). Report on Japanese Technology Licensing Offices and R&D Intellectual Property Right Issues. Retrieved
February 12, 2010 from http://www.finstitute.gr.jp/science/reports/TLOVALMIS.pdf.
34. CIA.gov (2010). World Fact Book – Japan. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-
35. Ou, G. (2008). Japan’s ISPs agree to ban P2P Pirates. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=1063.
36. . Heritage.org (2010). 2010 Index of Economic Freedom – Japan. Retrieved on April 14, 2010 from http://www.heritage.org/Index/Country/Japan
37. Ogawara, S., Chen, J., Zhang, Q. (2003). Internet Grocery Business in Japan: Current Business Models and Future Trends. Retrieved on
February 13, 2010 from http://barney.gonzaga.edu/~chen/misall/sample_paper_2.pdf
38. Research and Markets: The Latest Japan Food and Drink Report is Available Now.” Business Wire. Business Wire. 2009. Retrieved March 06,
2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-204322114.html
39. Journal of Business Research (2004). Efficient consumer response in Japan Industry concerns, current status, benefits, and barriers to
implementation. Retrieved on February 26, 2009 from
pan.pdf.
40. Ross, Peter. “Human Resource Management in Japan: Changes and Uncertainties.(Book review).” International Journal of Employment Studies.
GROWES Research Group. 2005. Retrieved April 02, 2010 from HighBeam Research:
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-151608804.html
41. Research and Markets: EthicsPoint: Transforming Compliance into Business Process ROI.” Business Wire. Business Wire. 2008.
Retrieved April 02, 2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-177821339.html
42. Dodd, John. “Aeon vs. the trend of Japanese and world retailers: an insider’s look at ERP and how it will help the Japanese retailers fight
back.(Sponsored Section)(Interview).” Japan Inc.. Japan Inc. Communications. 2003. Retrieved March 26, 2010 from HighBeam
Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-108722613.html
43. Thompson, Abby K.; Paul J. Moughan. “Innovation in the foods industry: functional foods.” Innovation: Management, Policy, & Practice. eContent
Management Pty Ltd. 2008. Retrieved April 16, 2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-182614579.html
44. GNX Honored in Prestigious Microsoft EMEA RAD 2004 Award Competition; GNX ProductVine PDM Solution Wins for ‘Best Demonstration of
Scalability’.” PR Newswire. PR Newswire Association LLC. 2004. Retrieved April 16, 2010 from HighBeam Research:
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-124646747.html
45. TNS World Panel (2008). Discounters set more records. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://www.tnsglobal.com/_assets/files/TNS_Market_Research_Market_Share_Nov08.htm.
46. Judge, E. Times Online. Giants may deliver a knockout blow to the high street. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/consumer_affairs/article3372246.
47. Ellis-Chadwick, F. Doherty, N. F., Anastasakis, L. 2007. E-strategy in the UK retail grocery sector: a resource-based analysis. Managing Service
Quality Vol. 17 No. 6. Retrieved on 16 February 2010 from www.emeraldinsight.com/0140-9174.htm.
48. Seager, A. (2010). UK scrapes out of recession but growth figure disappoints City. Guardian. Retrieved on 16 February 2010 from
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/jan/26/uk-recession-over.
49. Office of Government Commerce. About OGC. Retrieved on 16 February 2010 from http://www.ogc.gov.uk/about_OGC.asp.
50. CIA.gov (2010). World Fact Book – UK. Retrieved on 17 April 2010 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/uk.html.
51. Hingley, M. Taylor, S. Ellis, C. (2007). Radio frequency identification tagging: Supplier attitudes to implementation in the grocery retail sector.
Retrieved on 26 February 2010 from http://www.emeraldinsight.com.libezproxy2.syr.edu/10.1108/09590550710820685.
52. Doherty, N., Ellis-Chadwick, F., (2009). Exploring the drivers, scope and perceived success of e-commerce strategies in the UK retail sector.
European Journal of Marketing. Vol. 43 No. 9/10. pp. 1246-1262.
53. Thornbory, G.. (2008). Your secret’s safe with OH. Occupational Health, 60(3), 29-31. Retrieved April 3, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global.
(Document ID: 1453081561).
54. Powanga, M., & Powanga, L.. (2008). Deploying RFID in Logistics: Criteria and Best Practices and Issues. The Business Review, Cambridge,
9(2), 1-10. Retrieved March 27, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1617904671).
55. Profit through partnership. (1994). Logistics Information Management, 7(3), 41. Retrieved March 5, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global.
(Document: 880948).
56. Dairy Farmer. Handley prepares to man the barricades! (2008). Retrieved March 7, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry.
(Document ID: 1558834721).
57. Bia. B (2010). Irish Food Board. Spanish Market Overview. Retrieved on February 13,2010 from
58. Ivory Research (2010). Strategic Management of Supermarkets. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from
http://www.ivoryresearch.com/sample5.php.
59. Kamel. M. et al. (2008). Bain Brief. Finding Growth in Europe’s Shifting Grocery Landscape. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from
http://www.bain.com/bainweb/LocalOffices/in_the_news_detail.asp.
60. researchandmarkets.com (2009). The Global Economic Crisis: The Impact On Consumer Attitudes & Behaviors In Spain. Retrieved on
February 13, 2010 from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reportinfo.asp?rfm=rss&report_id=1056342.
61. Muñoz, E., Espinosa de los, J. and Diaz, V. (2000). Innovation Policy in Spain. Technology, innovation and economy in Spain: National and
regional influences. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://www.iesam.csic.es/doctrab1/dt-0003.pdf.
62. Competition Commission. (2006). This independent body issues recommendations on legislation to protect competition in various UK industries.
Retrieved on 17 April 2010 from http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/inquiries/ref2006/grocery/provisional_decision_remedies.htm.
63. state.gov (2009). Background Note: Spain. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2878.htm.
64. Socolovsky, J. (2005). Religious Education Issues Divide Spain. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5028521.
. Lavazza Selects ATG to Consolidate Multiple Sites Into Unified, Global Portal; ATG Enterprise Portal Suite Unites New B2B, B2C, and B2E
Initiatives. Business Wire. 2002. HighBeam Research. Retrieved on 27 February 2010 from http://www.highbeam.com.
67. Watson, Elaine. “The hub lines: B2B exchanges must make strides in supply chain services if they’re to realise their grand designs. (clicks not
bricks).” Grocer. William Reed Ltd. 2002. HighBeam Research. 8 Mar. 2010 http://www.highbeam.com
68. ARINSO International to focus on Managed Payroll Services as part of European outsourcing strategy; Conor Gallagher joins from LogicaCMG to
lead initiative.” M2 Presswire. M2 Communications Ltd. 2003. Retrieved April 01, 2010 from HighBeam
Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-104875127.html
69. Boom time for outsourced logistics business; Enterprise expenditure on third-party logistics providers set to increase significantly. M2 Presswire.
M2 Communications Ltd. 2006. Retrieved March 27, 2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-141005595.html
70. Rondeau, Patrick J.; Lewis A. Litteral. Evolution of manufacturing planning and control systems: from reorder point to enterprise resources
planning. Production & Inventory Management Journal. American Production and Inventory Control Society Inc. 2001.
Retrieved March 27, 2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-83045565.html
71. CIMData (2003). PDM to PLM: Growth of An Industry. Retrieved on April 15, 2010 from
http://www.e-nea.com/servicios/documentacion/PDM%20to%20PLM%20-%20Growth%20of%20An%20Industry%20-
%20March%202003.pdf.
72. Santella (2008). Retailer and FSP. Shopper and Retailer Articles. Retreived 27 April 2010 from
hhttp://www.santella.com/frequent.htm#SUPERMARKET%20FACTS%20-%20INDUSTRY%20OVERVIEW%2020
73. Goodman A. (1996). New York Times. International Business. Small Family-Run Stores in Spain Are Fighting to Limit the Hypermarkets.
Retrieved on 27 February 2010 from http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/06/business/international-business-small-family-run-stores-spain-are-
fighting-limit.html
Categories: Business and Management, Database Technologies, Enterprise Architecture, Information Architecture, Information Management, Process Improvement, Reengineering, Strategic Planning, Uncategorized Tags:
Re-baselining of IT projects – Factors that makes it difficult and some recommendations to address them
Before addressing the question, it would be beneficial if we understand what baselining and re-baselining is. Baselining is the common project management method where we lay down the cost and effort estimates and schedules based on assumptions that we have at hand. Once baseline is created, project plan is laid out based on this baseline. But as projects go ahead, due changes in assumptions, project requirements, due to poor project oversight and other changes, the original cost / effort estimates and schedule does not fall good and calls for modification of the same based on new assumptions. If projects are not re-baselined at this stage, they fail drastically and / or lead to huge cost overrun.
Federal IT projects are not different. The situation is more obvious due to outdated (quickly changing) technology, complex systems, processes & systems, poor project estimation/planning/control mechanisms and lack of expertise to push and pull clean project management practices that leads to weak risk / change management and over and above all – politics. These situations that lead to re-baselining further determine the factors that in turn make it difficult to re-baseline federal IT projects, which include –
1. Need for re-estimation and arriving at revised cost estimation based on detailed work breakdown structureThis is one of the major factors that make re-baselining difficult task and time consuming to get on track especially when agency is dealing with multi-billion projects which are too complex to start with. Greatest concern is to make all assumptions clear and realistic so that re-baselining is avoided in future. Immediate remedial action would be to spend considerable time to figure out what the actual need is and clearly define what individual components of work / task need to be executed to achieve the task. Expert advice should be sought for each major task to determine closest cost, effort and time.
2. Need for re-work on EVM formulas and calculation to adjust new cost and valueEarned Value Management (EVM) is the most widely used and federal standard to measure performance of an IT investment. Re-baselining causes the project team / agency to rebuild EVM formulas based on new cost, effort and value and this involves considerable cost, effort and risk management to ensure that the expected ROI is attained within reasonable time period for changed scenario. Once we arrive at clear work break down structure and have a clear idea of how work / task need to be executed and integrated to achieve the clear goal, EVM analysis and establishment should not be a problem.
3. Lack of credibility on the part of agency to have this oversight and take the responsibility to fix issues and propose the business case for re-baseliningThis issue would keep the agencies from announcing the fact that they have actually overrun the budget and are in grave need to rebaseline. The memorandum from CIO and OMB director urges agencies to announce for help and declare that they need to re-baseline based on an investment’s poor performance. OMB need to ensure that it provides appropriate support for the agencies and that it gives them a chance to correct any issues that would have lead to re-baseline. OMB need to clearly define the expectations that it needs to have in a re-baseline plan and to monitor its progress.
Bibliography
1. usaspending.gov (2010). Federal IT Dashboard. Retrieved on 02nd November from http://it.usaspending.gov/
2. os.doc.gov (2010). US. DoC, Office of CIO – IT Investment Performance Management Policy. Retrieved on 02nd November from http://ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandPrograms/Policy___Standards/PROD01_004949
3. Whitehouse.gov (2010). Reforming the Federal Government’s Efforts to Manage Information Technology Projects. Retrieved on 02nd November from http://www.whitehouse.gov//sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m_10-25.pdf
4. Whitehouse.gov (2010). Information Technology Investment Baseline Management Policy. Retrieved on 02nd November from http://www.whitehouse.gov//sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-27.pdf
5. Whitehouse.gov (2010). Immediate Review of Financial Systems IT Projects. Retrieved on 02nd November from http://www.whitehouse.gov//sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m-10-26.pdf
6. Whitehouse.gov (2010). Sharing Data While Protecting Privacy. Retrieved on 02nd November from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2011/m11-02.pdf
7. Whitehouse.gov (2010). Pilot Projects for the Partnership Fund for Program Integrity Innovation. Retrieved on 02nd November from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2011/m11-01.pdf
Article copyright (c) 2010 – 2020 – Deepesh Joseph (deepeshjoseph@yahoo.com)


