Reengineering

Reengineering Principles

The standard Reengineering principles are as follows -

1. Organize work around its end results, not tasks

According to this principle, it is optimal to determine the work’s end result rather than dividing the work into small tasks & units. We try to rearrange the work process so that a single person can perform all the steps involved. This eliminates wastage of time due to trailing of work processes through many hands and also puts workers in control of processes. Organizing work around end results reduces the number of intermediate levels of approvals and assign a single concerned personnel to perform all the tasks.

2. Capture data only once when it is first created

According to this principle, the company shall capture & store data only one time when it is first created. In other words, the should avoid redundant data. The company should avoid accepting the same data via input forms that has already being entered in the enterprise database. The use of IT enabled systems such the EDI systems, OLT systems DSS, data warehousing systems EIS etc will help to setup the appropriate information management system for the enterprise that deals with data consistency, integrity, correctness and avoiding data redundancy.

3. Allow decision points where work is performed

In usual work setups, the processes are completely controlled by the managers and supervisors. This often fasten hierarchical management structures. The actual doers are assumed to lack the knowledge or responsibility o take a process to completion. The reengineered process argues that the people who actually do the work should be the ones to make many of the decisions about it, and that the controls over the decisions should be built into the systems that workers use.

Such an approach to work will reduce layers of organizational bureaucracy and changes the roles of workers and supervisors. It empowers the doers to better control their own work environment.

4. Incorporate controls into information processing

While reengineering a business process, we allow the people who collect the information to process the information too. Such controls are incorporated to the information processing system in such a way that usually a single computer could process and store all the related information of a process. The single computer shall process all the data in seconds and at a single location, thus avoiding the process to stretch along the various functions. Now, the person handling the computer system is responsible for the whole process and usually this change in responsibility is a boon to efficiency. Instead of allowing a discrepancy to pass through to several people within an organization, it can be stopped at the source.

5. Make people who use a process do the work

Over specialized and complex processes brings in bureaucracies and will cause people to spend undue time and energy following company policies and strict functional approaches rather than common sense. Make people who use a process do the work means that the reengineered process lets users get their own supplies and information by building controls into the system. If, for eg:, the accounting department requires some stationary items, it should not have to go to another department to administer the process. Instead, the purchasing group shall setup master accounts in a computer system to deal with any sort of purchasing in any other departments indirectly via distributed computer applications and this allow the accounts department to buy the stationary by itself and get the necessary data updated in the purchasing department’s master account.

6. Work in parallel instead of sequentially and later integrate the results

Reengineered business setup enables multiple work projects to be handled in parallel so that the individual projects are linked & coordinated in such a way that the end product development is accelerated without any breakup in between. Reengineering enabled by IT solutions such as the enterprise wide intranets, CAD/CAM systems, manufacturing automation systems, ERP systems, EDI systems, work group internet works etc, supports this work in parallel and integrate results methodology.

7. Treat geographically dispersed resources as one

According to this reengineering principle, the reengineered system will enable the enterprise to integrate the geographically separated resources (man, machine, money, information) and provide a centralized control over these resources. Consider the case of enterprise’s information management setup in the reengineered system. The enterprise wide intranet integrates the distributed data sources and data stores by allowing data sharing, peer-to-peer communication between data applications and a centralized control over the intranet by the IT department. When we take the case of the workforce, we may integrate the workforce of the enterprise towards the common goal of the enterprise by enabling the workers to interact with each other and with the related process via the intranet.

Shared databases, telecommunication networks and standardized processing systems now make it possible to gain the benefits of scale and centralization while maintaining the advantages of the flexibility and service that come from being dispersed and close to the customer.

 Article copyright (c) 2010 – 2020 – www.getallarticles.com

 

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by admin - November 25, 2011 at 4:12 pm

Categories: Business and Management, Information Management, Process Improvement, Reengineering, Uncategorized   Tags:

Why Companies Do Reengineering?

Companies are doing reengineering since they want to remain stable in the dynamic business environment while facing changing strategies, financial crisis due to weak / poor / outdated business processes, technological changes, change in customer demands & business competition. Everyone is going for reengineering since it usually provides a quick fix for the present problem by a suitable business transformation. Everyone has great aspirations while reengineering one’s business, since reengineering surely brings out various potential benefits that usually breakeven the costs of reengineering. The following are the potential benefits brought  about by reengineering that inspires every business enterprise to go for it.

Benefit level 1: Provides a quick fix for the present problem

Benefit level 2: Business processes are refined according to the improved strategies

Benefit level 3: Refined business processes creates high quality products & services, reduced paperwork, reduced manual labor and reduced process cycle times.

Benefit level 4: The above benefit creates high quality and value added products and services shipped to the customers in time. This improves customer satisfaction and customer support. The company now tends to care more for its customers.

Benefit level 5: Cash flow is improved which leads to easy realization of ROI and business profits and gains.

Benefit level 6: This leads to business prosperity and stability.

Article Copyright – Deepesh Joseph (2010)

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by admin - November 15, 2011 at 9:12 pm

Categories: Business and Management, Information Architecture, Information Management, Process Improvement, Reengineering   Tags:

Reengineering an accounts payable function

Consider the case of approving a loan application. In the manual process, it takes 6 persons and considerable amount of time to accept the details, calculating risks and repayment capabilities and letting the application trail through hands of various functional levels. But, when we reengineer the above process, the whole process may be converted to a PC based applications handled by a single person who performs the formal dealings with the customer & inputs the details on the computer generated form. All further, calculations and checking & further approval of the loan is made by the computer by checking various records of the customer. Here, the reengineered business system is process based since all the trailing levels are capsulated into a single person to perform the process. The benefits of reengineered process lies in the customer satisfaction, reduced business process cycle time, reduced manual labor, reduced paper work and reduced number of persons to perform / complete the process.

Thus, BPR has various potential benefits that leads to long term business stability and process refinements. This prompts every business enterprise to go for BPR when it requires to change its business strategies due to changing customer demands, financial crisis, technological changes and business competition.

Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2011

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by admin - October 30, 2011 at 10:13 pm

Categories: Business and Management, Process Improvement, Reengineering   Tags:

Creating Process based Organizations via Reegineering

While reengineering a business enterprise, we create a process based organization structure for the enterprise to avoid the inefficiencies and time wasting business process cycles as in a functions based organization. ie – the business process information systems and the enterprise wide information infrastructure are integrated in such a way that the people of various functions or departments could easily form teams for related activities and project works. Such a process based system enables faster business process cycles, workflows and data flows that creates a total quality business setup. The business enterprise is now able to produce its products and services faster and with added value to satisfy its customers.

Often, when we reengineer a business enterprise, a process that took 3 days and 6 persons to get completed, will require say only a single person and a PC and say only 2 hrs to finish the process with all formalities satisfying the business rules.

Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2011

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by admin - at 10:03 pm

Categories: Business and Management, Information Management, Organizational Change, Process Improvement, Reengineering, Strategic Planning   Tags:

Basic approaches to Reengineering

The three basic approaches to reengineering are as follows -

1. STREAMLIING

2. INTEGRATING

3. TRANSFORMING 

1. Streamlining – Streamlining approach to reengineering the business offers a basic, segmented, quick-fix methodology for reengineering. It cleans up and treats symptoms but doesn’t  necessarily transform a process nor find a cure for a bad process. It doesn’t change the way a company conducts its core business nor does it impose whether certain processes should exist at all. For eg: while reengineering an accounts payable process, we may reduce the staffs from the existing number to 7. If we follow a thorough transformation approach, this would require total number of 17 sign offs. The streamlining approach of reengineering the accounts payable process may also increase the level of spending authorization for managers. Another approach would be to translate the current workflow and dataflow via electronic means such as EDI. In essence, the streamlining approach to reengineering is simple, functional and makes operations go faster or better.

2. Integrating – The integrating approach to reengineering integrates discrete business processes, replacing them with a unified process that frequently cut across functions and department responsibilities i.e, it creates a process based organization of workflows within the reengineered process. For eg:, when we reengineer a sample business process that formerly required the functional trailing of workflows among various departments such as accounting, purchasing and warehousing, we re-order the workflows so that the individual functions are closely related by reducing redundancies, cycle-times and unnecessary retention of separate receiving logs and lists of prices. Now, the reengineered process will cut across all the functions and will now require only lesser number of persons and manual labor and lesser process cycle times to perform the tasks. But when we consider the business as a whole, the reengineering by integrating has only changed the accounts payable process, but it doesn’t change the way the enterprise produced / manufactured products nor does it directly affect other major functions of the enterprise, but it has a profound influence on the jobs of the people performing the accounts payable process.

3. Transforming - Transforming approach to reengineering transforms the company as a whole. When such an organizational transformation is carried out, the projects should get complete commitment and sponsorship from the top management and support from the working staff. New strategies, policies, objectives and plans will have to be devised to effect the complete transformation. The enterprise shall search for the appropriate technology and workflows to setup the transformed system. The company shall benchmark its existing system with that of another similar company which has already applied reengineering in its system. The company shall seek help from IT consultants to bring in the right infrastructure and IT solutions.

Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2011

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by admin - at 9:53 pm

Categories: Business and Management, Information Management, Organizational Change, Process Improvement, Reengineering, Strategic Planning   Tags:

Basic steps in Business Process Reengineering

We can generalize Business Process Reengineering (BPR) efforts as an eight step process as follow -

Step 1: Formulate / Modify business visions, policies, objectives

Step 2: Formulate / Modify business strategies according to changing customer requirements, technology changes and competition

Step 3: Analyze the existing business process cycles & workflows and determine how they may be modified or refined

Step 4: Apply IT to setup an optimal Business Information Management Architecture (BIMA) to support the reengineered business process

Step 5: Modify or redesign the existing processes according to the reengineering strategies and develop refined Business Process Automation Systems (BPAS)

Step 6: Apply IT strategies to map BIMA onto an Enterprise Information Management System (EIMS) that is integrated across the enterprise and that fits into and supports the reengineered Business process cycles and workflows.

Step 7: Integrate the EIMS with the BPAS to build up the completed reengineered  business system

Step 8: Repeat steps 1-7 for continuous BPR due to changing customer demands, technology changes and business strategies, which leads to business stability

Since information management is a key factor in BPR, the BPR efforts are enabled & supported by a variety of IT solutions.

Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2011

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by admin - October 28, 2011 at 8:53 pm

Categories: Business and Management, Process Improvement, Reengineering   Tags:

What is Re-engineering? Why companies are doing re-engineering?

Re-engineering or Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) is way of rethinking or redesigning the existing business systems both in technical and behavioral terms. The ultimate goal of BPR is to continuously improve the business process cycles so that a total quality is built to the business system, its processes & workflows that reflects as high quality products & services produced by the enterprise. As quality products and services are provided by the enterprise for its customers, customers are able to gain value for the products and services that they buy. This improves customer satisfaction and customer orders. This further improves cash flows and easy realization of business profits and gains.

Now, since BPR leads to continuous business process improvements, the business process cycles and workflows are continuously refined according to changing strategies, technologies and customer demands. This ultimately leads to business stability in the competitive industry / business environment. Since every enterprise is striving for business stability, everyone is going for BPR.

BPR involves considering everything from business strategies to processes to organization structures to management systems (people, machine, money, information) to values & beliefs of the enterprise that undergoes BPR.

Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2011

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by admin - at 8:16 pm

Categories: Business and Management, Enterprise Architecture, Reengineering, Strategic Planning   Tags:

Mind Mapping technique to prepare WBS

I would prefer the mind mapping technique to arrive at WBS (work break down structure), due to my liking for problem solving by visualization and modeling techniques. Another reason to like that technique is that it is very much similar to various modeling tools that we use during the System Analysis phase of product development and I have been closely working in this area. I would compare mind mapping method of creating WBS to preparing a context diagram. Just like a context diagram forms the basis for the high level and detail level data flows, a mind map forms the basis for high level and detailed level tasks. One great advantage of mind mapping model is that they account for easy translation to structure and plan since they work similar to translating our thoughts into sensible actions.

I haven’t personally used mind mapping since I haven’t prepared an official WBS on any project. However I sometimes use mind mapping technique for my own scheduling.

Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2010

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by admin - October 15, 2011 at 9:58 pm

Categories: Business and Management, Information Management, Knowledge Management, Process Improvement, Project Management, Reengineering   Tags:

Strategic alignment of IT resources – A case study in Grocery industry (Part 2)

Strategic alignment of IT resources – A case study in Grocery industry (Part 2)

 

 

Japan 

UK

Spain

US

Effect of economic situation

The effect of recession has prompted Japanese to be
more cautious while selecting grocery stores to shop. This situation is
breeding ground for underdeveloped private label market in Japan to
capitalize on price (32).

Consumers have scaled back spending and repaid debt
amid signs of slow recovery. In Q4 of 2009, the UK economy experienced the
first economic expansion in six quarters. Low consumer confidence, high
personal and government debt, and high taxes will slow recovery (48).

Recession has its impacts on buying habits on
Spanish people too. While looking out for cheaper private labels, they also
have increased quality sense (60).

Currently, there is high trends
that shows shift from eating out to going back to grocery stores and save money
(usage coupons etc). There exists high food prices,
down economy, low consumer confidence and notion of ‘healthy eating which is
required and costly (4).

Technology & Infrastructure Issues

Concerns that old style of doing business is not
viable any more. Trying to improve innovation systems (33).

Robust private markets for technology and services.
Strong government support for capturing value in public sector (49).

Innovation system
highly dependent on foreign technology. Deficit appears to be structural
(61).

Major technology thrust pushes industry to take
drastic steps towards customer satisfaction and innovation (5).

Integration Issues

System integration issues due to heavy mergers
between companies and due to suppliers’ legacy systems.

Applications developers must understand retailers’
business and integrate with its existing systems as part of its value
proposition.

Severe integration issues in supply chain.

Major challenge is integration issues while
targeting global sourcing and thus being exposed to wider pool of suppliers, providing multi-channel
integration for customers and integration with legacy systems.

 

Japan

UK

Spain

US

Political Structure

A parliamentary government with a constitutional
monarchy. Legal system is modeled after European civil law systems with
English-American influence; judicial review of legislative acts in the
Supreme Court. Supreme Court (chief justice is appointed by the monarch after
designation by the cabinet; all other justices are appointed by the cabinet)
(34).

Constitutional monarchy and Commonwealth realm (50).

Basque Nationalist Party , Canarian Convergence and
Union Coalition, Democratic Union of Catalonia (63).

Even though current US political setup and
administration is convinced that supporting innovation and entrepreneurship
is necessary for improving the economic conjuncture, the existing economic
recession cause consumer product manufacturers to reconsider their plans to
launch new products for Grocery industry (6,7).

Legislation

In 2006, the Internet providers attempted to
disconnect users anytime they detected P2P or any other file-sharing
software. The Japanese Ministry attempted to block P2P but stopped because of
concerns of privacy issues (35).

Growing dominance of large grocery chains prompted
Office of Fair Trading to review competitive practices of largest retailers
(62). Fear that smaller suppliers and sole proprietorships will be pushed out
of markets has prompted lawmakers to consider limiting labor and operational
tactics used by large grocers.

Education expenditures
amount to 4.2% of the population, which compares to 97th in the world. By
law, every public school in the country is required to teach Roman
Catholicism. But new legislation has been enacted which has made religious
classes optional (64).

Current US administration has put forth various
legislative measures to support product innovation and growth of grocery
industry, especially when Grocery Manufacturers association is influencing US
Senate to modernize U.S. Chemical Safety Laws (8).

Trade Policy

Japan’s weighted average tariff rate was 1.3 percent
in 2008. Import and export bans and restrictions, import quotas and
licensing, services market access barriers, non-transparent and burdensome
regulations and standards, restrictive sanitary and phytosanitary
rules, restrictions in government procurement, state trade in some goods,
subsidies, and inefficient customs administration add to the cost of trade
(36).

The Bank of England periodically coordinates
interest rate moves with the European Central Bank, but Britain remains
outside the European Economic and Monetary Union (50).

Spain’s trade policy
is the same as that of other members of the European Union. The common EU
weighted average tariff rate was 1.3 percent in 2008. However, the EU has
high or escalating tariffs for agricultural and manufacturing products, and
its MFN tariff code is complex.

US trade policies are designed to support grocery
industry expansion in developing areas and to reduce overhead for Grocery
stores and put in more money for product innovation (4).

 

Porter’s Competitive Forces Model

 

Porter's Competitive Model

Porter's Competitive Model

Dominant Blueprints & Strategic Focus

Dominant Blueprints & Strategic focus

 

Blueprint  (Drivers & Constraints)

Blueprint

Force

Japan

UK

Spain

US

Multi-Channel

Easy To Do Business With

Driver 

Acquisition
of small wholesalers, mergers and cooperative agreements are in response to
need for greater efficiency (39).
 

Growing
interest in shopping online makes retailers pursue web strategies that
compliment brick & mortar experience(47).

Efficiency
of marketing to consumers who often make decision to buy at point-of-sale(65).

Technology/Innovation
infusion in the form of Web 2.0 and mobile technology offers wide options for
channel integration and is leading blueprint’s development and alignment of
IT (20).

Constraint

Shortage
of technical capability, attitudinal problems preventing wholesalers,
retailers, and manufacturers from working together. Poor penetration of
technology in traditional-bound portions of value chain (39).

Ordering
more efficient with RFID(51). Loyalty programs track
individual consumers‘ and tailor promotions (52).

Today,
more grocers are collecting customer-specific data. Large retailers using
RFID to deliver targeted promotions (66).

Convincing
customers to thinking “My Store” rather than “The store“.
Greater reliance on integration for increased sales, customer retention and
profitability (16,17,18,19).

Spend Management

Low Cost

Driver

The
market has shifted its focus to support more discount store models in order
to provide lower prices to customer (38).

Spend
management encourages higher quality and greater choice (Profit through
partnership, 1994), faster replenishment.

Spend
management software has been delivered to the enterprise however,
Europe was a unique case because of the large number of languages owed to its
significant presence in both Western and Eastern Europe (67).

Economic
recession compels companies to cut costs on direct and indirect
goods/services and they resort to spend management solutions to gain
visibility into the area of procurement and analysis(US21).

Constraint

Recession
is having a major negative impact on consumer confidence, as they look for
ways to cut back on daily expenditure and retailers have to drastically
rethink their operating strategies in an effort to retain even moderate
growth levels (38).

Cash
purchases without loyalty card provide no customer data to improve decisions.

Mega-Hubs were launched with promise to provide
interoperability between trading exchanges, however companies were not ready
to invest into the process because it was a separate entity (67).

Walmart’s efforts to align IT to
current spend management blueprint is partly hindered by cultural/language
barriers while on its journey to global sourcing (23).

Employee

 

Productivity Multiplier

Driver

A
decade of declining economic growth aligned with contextual factors, such as
an ageing workforce, has caused Japanese firms to introduce changes to their
HRM strategies (40).

Respecting
employee rights to privacy and confidentiality requires controls that limit
data exchange between applications and by information consumer.

Integrating
and automating HR processes and multiple country systems is demanding for
service providers (68).

Increased
need to reduce the total cost of employee communication per year , improve corporate hiring process and increased
productivity improvement ,all influence usage of employee centric blueprint
(24).

Constraint

Regulations,
compliance and ethical enforcement activities in many organizations have been
confined to a few specific operating silos such as HR, corporate security, and
legal, and have been conducted either on paper or on spreadsheets, making the
procedures difficult to share across the organization (41).

Data Protection Act,
Chartered Institute of Personnel Development, and
Information Commissioner’s Office provide extensive guidance on
responsibilities and obligations of employers (53).

For
many multinationals the cost of administering a pan-European HR & Payroll
policy, with all the complexities of EU and country reporting regulations and
compensation and benefits variations, has made the HR & payroll
outsourcing message a compelling one (68).

Severe
integration issues exist when grocers try to implement fined tuned HCM
systems to support the blueprint as in the case of Brookshire Grocery store
(25)

Blueprint

Force

Japan

UK

Spain

US

Supply Management

Fast & Responsive Service

Driver

The smaller supermarket chains around the country
are slowly being acquired. Larger retailers are consolidating and expanding
their territories. Retailers have too much inventories on hand
and they need to cut their cost structure, both in terms of labor costs and
store operations, and reducing inventories (42).

Tesco uses RFID tags on milk and DVDs to track
product from production facilities to shelf. Supplies can be replenished
faster and DVD stocks better organized on shelf (54).

Grocery retailers such as Asda
and Tesco have been marked to increase their product ranges, however European
companies are still refining the use (CPFER, 3PL, 4PL) infrastructure to
stave off the competitive pressures of expansion (69).

Early
adoption of EDI as common standardized means of integrated SCM systems
communication has smoothened the efforts of SCM
integrations between grocery stores and suppliers (26).

Constraint

focused (42).

Shorter order times, faster payment, interaction by
tech, finance and stock management personnel (55).

ERP does not as of yet have a dominant industry
association such as Manufacturing Execution Systems Association (MESA)
governing its development (70).

The
main driver that contributes to alignment of IT towards SCM blueprint is the strive towards service differentiation and the need to
remain competitive by being innovative in the SCM arena (27).

Product Innovation

Product Innovation

Driver

Health is a key factor in determining customers’
food choices. It is recognized that the consumption of certain foods can
promote improved health and well-being and the prevention or minimization of
disease. The addition of functional ingredients enables a product to be
distanced from other products within the same category, increasing the profit
margins and reducing the impact of price wars with competing commodity
products (43).

Introducing private label goods as a way to provide
low-cost alternative produces conflict with preferred suppliers (56).

CAD application resulted in an explosion of digital
data. Because those design applications created many digital files, it became

increasingly difficult to effectively
capture, manage, and control the output of those systems (71).

One
of the major drivers that support product innovation blueprint usage in US
grocery industry is the strive for brand focus,
which is implicitly offered by the underlying PLM solution (28).

Constraint

According to GNX’s VP of
Product Development, the typical retailer private brand program comprising
several thousand products (SKUs) that are constantly changing, and data
maintenance can be a significant challenge. Failure to effectively manage
this data can negatively impact consumer confidence and market
competitiveness (44).

Grocery stores can provide aggregated customer data
to reveal preferences, but manufacturers must make independent decision to
change how they produce their goods.

By the 1990’s, industry demanded more sophisticated
applications to address issues such as product structure, change control,
configuration management, and others (71).

Full
collaboration with suppliers has been one of the major issues in ensuring
complete strategic alignment with the blueprint (28).

 

Countries Position in Blueprint Evolution

 

Countries' position in Blueprint

Summaries, Interpretations, and Lessons Learned

 

•Customer’s are time-consciousness and demand power to establish preferences and satisfaction level has an ever increasing influence on the development and acceptance of multi-channel blueprints.

•Spend management is an essential dimension in business intelligence solutions, enabling better visibility into factors influencing strategic decisions.

•Leading grocery companies have invested enormous time and capital into aligning IT and business processes by standardizing applications.

•Retailers in the grocery industry search for innovative and efficient ways to integrate and standardize supply chain management by leveraging available IT resources to reinforce their business processes.

Conclusion

 

•Technology and innovation infusion has a positive impact on companies to quickly devise methods to establish effective means to perform sales promotions, improve customer service, provide easier and efficient tracking of products and supply chain management, and cut across multiple channels.

 •Leading grocery retailers are distinguished by their significant attention to—and investment in—aligning people, processes and technology.

 •To gain competitive advantage, retailers, manufacturers and wholesalers look for ways to reduce costs and improve response time by improving and standardizing their business processes.

•The major influences in the usage of product innovation blueprint are brand focus & subsequent differentiation and the strive towards effective means of product life cycle visualizations and subsequent IT alignment in satisfying a powerful customer.

References

 

. Gottlieb M. S. (2006). Grocery Stores- An Industry Study. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://www.msgcpa.com/files/Grocery.pdf.

2. Martinez S., Kaufman P. (n.d.) Twenty Years of Competition Reshape the U.S. Food Marketing System. Retrieved on February 14, 2010 from http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/April08/Features/FoodMarketing.htm.

3. SAS.com. (2008). SAS® Solutions for the grocery industry. Retrieved on February 14, 2010 from

  http://www.sas.com/resources/brochure/sas-solutions-for-grocery-industry-overview.pdf.

4. Carlo J. (2009). Supermarket Pharmacy Trends. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from

  http://www.gmdc.org/assets/pdf/hbw09_business_session_supermarket_pharmacy_trends.pdf.

5. PollackAssociates (2002). Supermarket Technology. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from

  http://www.supermarketalert.com/pdf%20docs/2Techology.pdf.

6. Innovation America (2009). New Model of Governance of American Innovation. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.innovationamerica.us/index.php/inthenews/bendis-ia-in-the-news/1191-new-model-of-governance-of-american-Innovation.

7. Neilson News. (2009). New Product Innovation In A Recession: More Challenges, But Opportunities Remain. Retrieved on April15th from

  http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/new-product-innovation-in-a-recession-more-challenges-but-opportunities-Remain/

8. cspa.org (2010). Industry Calls on Congress for Stakeholder Process to Modernize Outdated Chemical Law. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.cspa.org/infocenter/2010/03/industry-calls-on-congress-for-stakeholder-process-to-modernize-outdated-chemical-law/.

9. Mangaraj S. and Senauer B. (2008). A segmentation analysis of US grocery stores.  Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from

  http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/14328/1/tr01-08.pdf

10. Imlay T. (May, 2006). Challenges in Today’s U.S. Supermarket Industry. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from

. Martinez S., Kaufman P. (n.d.) Twenty Years of Competition Reshape the U.S. Food Marketing System. Retrieved on February 14, 20 from   http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/April08/Features/FoodMarketing.htm

12. Kaarst-Brown M.L. (2005). Understanding an organization’s view of the CIO: The role of assumptions about IT. MIS Quarterly Executive

  Vol. 4 No. 2 / June 2005

13. Pearlson K. E., Saunders C.S. (2008). Managing and using information systems. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

14. Kalakota R., Robinson M. (2003). services Blueprint – Road map for execution. Addison Wesly

15. Puciarelli J.C. (n.d.) Coping with the ” New Normal” ― How the Changed Economy Is Shaping IT Practices. on March 5th from 

  http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/ content/assets/newnormal.pdf

16. Andreine, D. (2008, October). Multi-Channel Integration Strategies and Environmental Aspects: A Conceptual Framework In Retailing.

  Retrieved on 25th Feb, from http://www.gcbe.us/8th_GCBE/data/Daniela%20Andreini.doc

17. sas.com (n.d.). SAS solutions for Grocery Industry. Retrieved on 25 February 2010 from http://www.sas.com/resources/brochure/sas-solutions-for-grocery-industry-overview.pdf.

18. Zahey, D.L. (n.d.). Challenges and Solutions in Multi Channel Retailing. Retrieved on 25 February 2010 from   http://www.junctionsolutions.com/programs/Challenges.pdf.

19. Carlo J. (2009). Supermarket Pharmacy Trends. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from   http://www.gmdc.org/assets/pdf/hbw09_business_session_supermarket_pharmacy_trends.pdf.

20. Slovenia, B. (2004, June). Developing a framework for multi-channel strategies – An analysis of cases from the Grocery Retail Industry. Retrieved   on 25th Feb, from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/2365947/Developing-A-Framework-For-Multi-Channel-Strategies-%EF%BF%BD-An-  Analysis

21. PayStreamAdvisors (2010). Retrieved on March 5th from http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/content/assets/whitepaper_

  eINV-Adoption-Ariba_673.pdf

. Gottlieb M. S. (2006). Grocery Stores- An Industry Study. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://www.msgcpa.com/files/Grocery.pdf.

 

2. Martinez S., Kaufman P. (n.d.) Twenty Years of Competition Reshape the U.S. Food Marketing System. Retrieved on February 14, 2010 from http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/April08/Features/FoodMarketing.htm.

 

3. SAS.com. (2008). SAS® Solutions for the grocery industry. Retrieved on February 14, 2010 from

  http://www.sas.com/resources/brochure/sas-solutions-for-grocery-industry-overview.pdf.

 

4. Carlo J. (2009). Supermarket Pharmacy Trends. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from

  http://www.gmdc.org/assets/pdf/hbw09_business_session_supermarket_pharmacy_trends.pdf.

 

5. PollackAssociates (2002). Supermarket Technology. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from

  http://www.supermarketalert.com/pdf%20docs/2Techology.pdf.

 

6. Innovation America (2009). New Model of Governance of American Innovation. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.innovationamerica.us/index.php/inthenews/bendis-ia-in-the-news/1191-new-model-of-governance-of-american-Innovation.

 

7. Neilson News. (2009). New Product Innovation In A Recession: More Challenges, But Opportunities Remain. Retrieved on April15th from

  http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/new-product-innovation-in-a-recession-more-challenges-but-opportunities-Remain/

 

8. cspa.org (2010). Industry Calls on Congress for Stakeholder Process to Modernize Outdated Chemical Law. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.cspa.org/infocenter/2010/03/industry-calls-on-congress-for-stakeholder-process-to-modernize-outdated-chemical-law/.

 

9. Mangaraj S. and Senauer B. (2008). A segmentation analysis of US grocery stores.  Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from

  http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/14328/1/tr01-08.pdf

 

10. Imlay T. (May, 2006). Challenges in Today’s U.S. Supermarket Industry. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479076.aspx

. Martinez S., Kaufman P. (n.d.) Twenty Years of Competition Reshape the U.S. Food Marketing System. Retrieved on February 14, 20 from   http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/April08/Features/FoodMarketing.htm

12. Kaarst-Brown M.L. (2005). Understanding an organization’s view of the CIO: The role of assumptions about IT. MIS Quarterly Executive

  Vol. 4 No. 2 / June 2005

13. Pearlson K. E., Saunders C.S. (2008). Managing and using information systems. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

14. Kalakota R., Robinson M. (2003). services Blueprint – Road map for execution. Addison Wesly

15. Puciarelli J.C. (n.d.) Coping with the ” New Normal” ― How the Changed Economy Is Shaping IT Practices. on March 5th from 

  http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/ content/assets/newnormal.pdf

16. Andreine, D. (2008, October). Multi-Channel Integration Strategies and Environmental Aspects: A Conceptual Framework In Retailing.

  Retrieved on 25th Feb, from http://www.gcbe.us/8th_GCBE/data/Daniela%20Andreini.doc

17. sas.com (n.d.). SAS solutions for Grocery Industry. Retrieved on 25 February 2010 from http://www.sas.com/resources/brochure/sas-solutions-for-grocery-industry-overview.pdf.

18. Zahey, D.L. (n.d.). Challenges and Solutions in Multi Channel Retailing. Retrieved on 25 February 2010 from   http://www.junctionsolutions.com/programs/Challenges.pdf.

19. Carlo J. (2009). Supermarket Pharmacy Trends. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from   http://www.gmdc.org/assets/pdf/hbw09_business_session_supermarket_pharmacy_trends.pdf.

20. Slovenia, B. (2004, June). Developing a framework for multi-channel strategies – An analysis of cases from the Grocery Retail Industry. Retrieved   on 25th Feb, from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/2365947/Developing-A-Framework-For-Multi-Channel-Strategies-%EF%BF%BD-An-  Analysis

21. PayStreamAdvisors (2010). Retrieved on March 5th from http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/content/assets/whitepaper_

  eINV-Adoption-Ariba_673.pdf

. Ariba.com (n.d). Next-Generation Spend Analysis: Beyond Commodity Classifications.  Retrieved on March 5th from http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/content/assets/NextGenerationSpendAnalysis.pdf

 23. Global Sourcing – Story 0904 (March, 2010). News Analysis: Where next for global sourcing?  Retrieved on March 5th 2010, from http://www.procurementleaders.com/news/latestnews/0904-walmart-supply-chain/

24. Kiosk.com (n.d). Self-service kiosks for HR. Retrieved on 3rd April, 2010, from http://kiosk.com/downloads/KIOSK_HR_Service.pdf

25. D’Anna J. (2009). Brookshire Grocery Company – Automating and integrating HR processes. Retrieved on 3rd  April 2010, from http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=7F248506905550A4188B61FB09F22A39826236B6EA2146527CB725D333B45D7B20ED77191A9627EA6371990543E5A9E6420244DE1870B8B4

26. Browna J.R. et. al. (2005). Supply chain management and the evolution of the “Big Middle”. Journal of retailing.

27. Byrnes J. (2003). Supply Chain Management in a Walmart World. Retrieved on March 26th 2010 from http://web.mit.edu/jlbyrnes/www/pdfs/Supply%20Chain%20Management%20in%20a%20Walmart%20World%20HB

28. Azzato M. (2009). 10 Steps to Maximize Store Brand Growth. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.agentrics.com/web/agentrics/10-steps-to-maximize-store-brand-growth2-25-10.

29. Austin N. (2006). Grocery Retail in Aisia-Pacific. Retrieved on 13 Feb, 2010 from http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/Grocery-retailing-in-Asia-Pacific.pdf.

30. Herbig, P. (1995). Marketing Japanese Style. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://www.greenwood.com/catalog/Q009.aspx.

31. Chida, N. (2004). Japan’s Seiyu reinventing itself using Wal-Mart best practices. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FNP/ is_23_43/ai_n8577546/.

 32. M2 Presswire (2009). The Global Economic Crisis: The Impact On Consumer Attitudes & Behaviors In Japan. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://www.just-food.com/store/product.aspx?id=79056.

. Rissanen, J. and Viitanen, J. (2001). Report on Japanese Technology Licensing Offices and R&D Intellectual Property Right Issues. Retrieved

February 12, 2010 from http://www.finstitute.gr.jp/science/reports/TLOVALMIS.pdf.

34. CIA.gov (2010). World Fact Book – Japan. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-

factbook/geos/ja.html.

35. Ou, G. (2008). Japan’s ISPs agree to ban P2P Pirates. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=1063.

36. . Heritage.org (2010). 2010 Index of Economic Freedom – Japan. Retrieved on April 14, 2010 from http://www.heritage.org/Index/Country/Japan

37. Ogawara, S., Chen, J., Zhang, Q. (2003). Internet Grocery Business in Japan:  Current Business Models and Future Trends. Retrieved on

February 13, 2010 from http://barney.gonzaga.edu/~chen/misall/sample_paper_2.pdf

38. Research and Markets: The Latest Japan Food and Drink Report is Available Now.” Business Wire. Business Wire. 2009. Retrieved March 06,

2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-204322114.html

39. Journal of Business Research (2004). Efficient consumer response in Japan Industry concerns, current status, benefits, and barriers to

implementation. Retrieved on February 26, 2009 from

http://faculty.lebow.drexel.edu/SuriR/Marketing%20Faculty%20Journal%20%20Pdf%20Files/Efficient%20consumer%20response%20in%20J

pan.pdf.

40. Ross, Peter. “Human Resource Management in Japan: Changes and Uncertainties.(Book review).” International Journal of Employment Studies.

GROWES Research Group. 2005. Retrieved April 02, 2010 from HighBeam Research:

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-151608804.html

41. Research and Markets: EthicsPoint: Transforming Compliance into Business Process ROI.” Business Wire. Business Wire. 2008.

Retrieved April 02, 2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-177821339.html

42. Dodd, John. “Aeon vs. the trend of Japanese and world retailers: an insider’s look at ERP and how it will help the Japanese retailers fight

back.(Sponsored Section)(Interview).” Japan Inc.. Japan Inc. Communications. 2003. Retrieved March 26, 2010 from HighBeam

Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-108722613.html

43. Thompson, Abby K.; Paul J. Moughan. “Innovation in the foods industry: functional foods.” Innovation: Management, Policy, & Practice. eContent

Management Pty Ltd. 2008. Retrieved April 16, 2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-182614579.html

44. GNX Honored in Prestigious Microsoft EMEA RAD 2004 Award Competition; GNX ProductVine PDM Solution Wins for ‘Best Demonstration of

Scalability’.” PR Newswire. PR Newswire Association LLC. 2004. Retrieved April 16, 2010 from HighBeam Research:

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-124646747.html

45. TNS World Panel (2008). Discounters set more records. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from

http://www.tnsglobal.com/_assets/files/TNS_Market_Research_Market_Share_Nov08.htm.

46. Judge, E. Times Online. Giants may deliver a knockout blow to the high street. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/consumer_affairs/article3372246.

47. Ellis-Chadwick, F. Doherty, N. F., Anastasakis, L. 2007. E-strategy in the UK retail grocery sector: a resource-based analysis. Managing Service

Quality Vol. 17 No. 6. Retrieved on 16 February 2010 from www.emeraldinsight.com/0140-9174.htm.

48. Seager, A. (2010). UK scrapes out of recession but growth figure disappoints City. Guardian. Retrieved on 16 February 2010 from

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/jan/26/uk-recession-over.

49. Office of Government Commerce. About OGC. Retrieved on 16 February 2010 from http://www.ogc.gov.uk/about_OGC.asp.

50. CIA.gov (2010). World Fact Book – UK. Retrieved on 17 April 2010 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/uk.html.

51. Hingley, M. Taylor, S. Ellis, C. (2007). Radio frequency identification tagging: Supplier attitudes to implementation in the grocery retail sector.

Retrieved on 26 February 2010 from http://www.emeraldinsight.com.libezproxy2.syr.edu/10.1108/09590550710820685.

52. Doherty, N., Ellis-Chadwick, F., (2009). Exploring the drivers, scope and perceived success of e-commerce strategies in the UK retail sector.

European Journal of Marketing. Vol. 43 No. 9/10. pp. 1246-1262.

 53. Thornbory, G.. (2008). Your secret’s safe with OH. Occupational Health, 60(3), 29-31.  Retrieved April 3, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global.

(Document ID: 1453081561).

54. Powanga, M., & Powanga, L.. (2008). Deploying RFID in Logistics: Criteria and Best Practices and Issues. The Business Review, Cambridge,

9(2), 1-10.  Retrieved March 27, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1617904671).

55. Profit through partnership. (1994). Logistics Information Management, 7(3), 41.  Retrieved March 5, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global.

(Document: 880948).

56. Dairy Farmer. Handley prepares to man the barricades! (2008). Retrieved March 7, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry.

(Document ID: 1558834721).

57. Bia. B (2010). Irish Food Board. Spanish Market Overview. Retrieved on February 13,2010 from

http://www.bordbia.ie/eventsnews/ConferencePresentations/FoodDrinksIndustryDayCountryOverviews/Spain%20Market%20Overview.pdf.

58. Ivory Research (2010). Strategic Management of Supermarkets. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from

http://www.ivoryresearch.com/sample5.php.

59. Kamel. M. et al. (2008). Bain Brief. Finding Growth in Europe’s Shifting Grocery Landscape. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from

http://www.bain.com/bainweb/LocalOffices/in_the_news_detail.asp.

60. researchandmarkets.com (2009). The Global Economic Crisis: The Impact On Consumer Attitudes & Behaviors In Spain. Retrieved on

February 13, 2010 from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reportinfo.asp?rfm=rss&report_id=1056342.

61. Muñoz, E., Espinosa de los, J. and Diaz, V. (2000). Innovation Policy in Spain. Technology, innovation and economy in Spain: National and

regional influences. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://www.iesam.csic.es/doctrab1/dt-0003.pdf.

62. Competition Commission. (2006). This independent body issues recommendations on legislation to protect competition in various UK industries.

Retrieved on 17 April 2010 from http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/inquiries/ref2006/grocery/provisional_decision_remedies.htm.

 63. state.gov (2009). Background Note: Spain. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2878.htm.

 64. Socolovsky, J. (2005). Religious Education Issues Divide Spain. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5028521.

. Lavazza Selects ATG to Consolidate Multiple Sites Into Unified, Global Portal; ATG Enterprise Portal Suite Unites New B2B, B2C, and B2E

Initiatives. Business Wire. 2002. HighBeam Research. Retrieved on 27 February 2010 from http://www.highbeam.com.

67. Watson, Elaine. “The hub lines: B2B exchanges must make strides in supply chain services if they’re to realise their grand designs. (clicks not

bricks).” Grocer. William Reed Ltd. 2002. HighBeam Research. 8 Mar. 2010 http://www.highbeam.com

68. ARINSO International to focus on Managed Payroll Services as part of European outsourcing strategy; Conor Gallagher joins from LogicaCMG to

lead initiative.” M2 Presswire. M2 Communications Ltd. 2003. Retrieved April 01, 2010 from HighBeam

Research:  http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-104875127.html

69. Boom time for outsourced logistics business; Enterprise expenditure on third-party logistics providers set to increase significantly. M2 Presswire.

M2 Communications Ltd. 2006. Retrieved March 27, 2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-141005595.html

70. Rondeau, Patrick J.; Lewis A. Litteral. Evolution of manufacturing planning and control systems: from reorder point to enterprise resources

planning. Production & Inventory Management Journal. American Production and Inventory Control Society Inc. 2001.

Retrieved March 27, 2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-83045565.html

71. CIMData (2003). PDM to PLM: Growth of An Industry. Retrieved on April 15, 2010 from

http://www.e-nea.com/servicios/documentacion/PDM%20to%20PLM%20-%20Growth%20of%20An%20Industry%20-

%20March%202003.pdf.

72. Santella (2008). Retailer and FSP. Shopper and Retailer Articles. Retreived 27 April 2010 from

hhttp://www.santella.com/frequent.htm#SUPERMARKET%20FACTS%20-%20INDUSTRY%20OVERVIEW%2020

73. Goodman A. (1996). New York Times. International Business. Small Family-Run Stores in Spain Are Fighting to Limit the Hypermarkets.

Retrieved on 27 February 2010 from http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/06/business/international-business-small-family-run-stores-spain-are-

fighting-limit.html

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by admin - October 11, 2011 at 10:30 pm

Categories: Business and Management, Database Technologies, Enterprise Architecture, Information Architecture, Information Management, Process Improvement, Reengineering, Strategic Planning, Uncategorized   Tags:

Re-baselining of IT projects – Factors that makes it difficult and some recommendations to address them

Before addressing the question, it would be beneficial if we understand what baselining and re-baselining is. Baselining is the common project management method where we lay down the cost and effort estimates and schedules based on assumptions that we have at hand. Once baseline is created, project plan is laid out based on this baseline. But as projects go ahead, due changes in assumptions, project requirements, due to poor project oversight and other changes, the original cost / effort estimates and schedule does not fall good and calls for modification of the same based on new assumptions. If projects are not re-baselined at this stage, they fail drastically and / or lead to huge cost overrun.

Federal IT projects are not different. The situation is more obvious due to outdated (quickly changing) technology, complex systems, processes & systems, poor project estimation/planning/control mechanisms and lack of expertise to push and pull clean project management practices that leads to weak risk / change management and over and above all – politics. These situations that lead to re-baselining further determine the factors that in turn make it difficult to re-baseline federal IT projects, which include –

1. Need for re-estimation and arriving at revised cost estimation based on detailed work breakdown structureThis is one of the major factors that make re-baselining difficult task and time consuming to get on track especially when agency is dealing with multi-billion projects which are too complex to start with. Greatest concern is to make all assumptions clear and realistic so that re-baselining is avoided in future. Immediate remedial action would be to spend considerable time to figure out what the actual need is and clearly define what individual components of work / task need to be executed to achieve the task. Expert advice should be sought for each major task to determine closest cost, effort and time.

2. Need for re-work on EVM formulas and calculation to adjust new cost and valueEarned Value Management (EVM) is the most widely used and federal standard to measure performance of an IT investment. Re-baselining causes the project team / agency to rebuild EVM formulas based on new cost, effort and value and this involves considerable cost, effort and risk management to ensure that the expected ROI is attained within reasonable time period for changed scenario. Once we arrive at clear work break down structure and have a clear idea of how work / task need to be executed and integrated to achieve the clear goal, EVM analysis and establishment should not be a problem.

3. Lack of credibility on the part of agency to have this oversight and take the responsibility to fix issues and propose the business case for re-baseliningThis issue would keep the agencies from announcing the fact that they have actually overrun the budget and are in grave need to rebaseline. The memorandum from CIO and OMB director urges agencies to announce for help and declare that they need to re-baseline based on an investment’s poor performance. OMB need to ensure that it provides appropriate support for the agencies and that it gives them a chance to correct any issues that would have lead to re-baseline. OMB need to clearly define the expectations that it needs to have in a re-baseline plan and to monitor its progress.

Bibliography

1. usaspending.gov (2010). Federal IT Dashboard. Retrieved on 02nd November from http://it.usaspending.gov/
2. os.doc.gov (2010). US. DoC, Office of CIO – IT Investment Performance Management Policy. Retrieved on 02nd November from http://ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandPrograms/Policy___Standards/PROD01_004949
3. Whitehouse.gov (2010). Reforming the Federal Government’s Efforts to Manage Information Technology Projects. Retrieved on 02nd November from http://www.whitehouse.gov//sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m_10-25.pdf
4. Whitehouse.gov (2010). Information Technology Investment Baseline Management Policy. Retrieved on 02nd November from http://www.whitehouse.gov//sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-27.pdf
5. Whitehouse.gov (2010). Immediate Review of Financial Systems IT Projects. Retrieved on 02nd November from http://www.whitehouse.gov//sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m-10-26.pdf
6. Whitehouse.gov (2010). Sharing Data While Protecting Privacy. Retrieved on 02nd November from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2011/m11-02.pdf
7. Whitehouse.gov (2010). Pilot Projects for the Partnership Fund for Program Integrity Innovation. Retrieved on 02nd November from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2011/m11-01.pdf

Article copyright (c) 2010 – 2020 – Deepesh Joseph (deepeshjoseph@yahoo.com)

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by admin - April 30, 2011 at 11:17 am

Categories: Business and Management, E-Governance, Enterprise Architecture, Finance Management, Information Architecture, Information Management, Knowledge Management, Process Improvement, Reengineering   Tags:

Next Page »