Creating Process based Organizations via Reegineering
While reengineering a business enterprise, we create a process based organization structure for the enterprise to avoid the inefficiencies and time wasting business process cycles as in a functions based organization. ie – the business process information systems and the enterprise wide information infrastructure are integrated in such a way that the people of various functions or departments could easily form teams for related activities and project works. Such a process based system enables faster business process cycles, workflows and data flows that creates a total quality business setup. The business enterprise is now able to produce its products and services faster and with added value to satisfy its customers.
Often, when we reengineer a business enterprise, a process that took 3 days and 6 persons to get completed, will require say only a single person and a PC and say only 2 hrs to finish the process with all formalities satisfying the business rules.
Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2011
Categories: Business and Management, Information Management, Organizational Change, Process Improvement, Reengineering, Strategic Planning Tags:
Basic approaches to Reengineering
The three basic approaches to reengineering are as follows -
1. STREAMLIING
2. INTEGRATING
3. TRANSFORMING
1. Streamlining – Streamlining approach to reengineering the business offers a basic, segmented, quick-fix methodology for reengineering. It cleans up and treats symptoms but doesn’t necessarily transform a process nor find a cure for a bad process. It doesn’t change the way a company conducts its core business nor does it impose whether certain processes should exist at all. For eg: while reengineering an accounts payable process, we may reduce the staffs from the existing number to 7. If we follow a thorough transformation approach, this would require total number of 17 sign offs. The streamlining approach of reengineering the accounts payable process may also increase the level of spending authorization for managers. Another approach would be to translate the current workflow and dataflow via electronic means such as EDI. In essence, the streamlining approach to reengineering is simple, functional and makes operations go faster or better.
2. Integrating – The integrating approach to reengineering integrates discrete business processes, replacing them with a unified process that frequently cut across functions and department responsibilities i.e, it creates a process based organization of workflows within the reengineered process. For eg:, when we reengineer a sample business process that formerly required the functional trailing of workflows among various departments such as accounting, purchasing and warehousing, we re-order the workflows so that the individual functions are closely related by reducing redundancies, cycle-times and unnecessary retention of separate receiving logs and lists of prices. Now, the reengineered process will cut across all the functions and will now require only lesser number of persons and manual labor and lesser process cycle times to perform the tasks. But when we consider the business as a whole, the reengineering by integrating has only changed the accounts payable process, but it doesn’t change the way the enterprise produced / manufactured products nor does it directly affect other major functions of the enterprise, but it has a profound influence on the jobs of the people performing the accounts payable process.
3. Transforming - Transforming approach to reengineering transforms the company as a whole. When such an organizational transformation is carried out, the projects should get complete commitment and sponsorship from the top management and support from the working staff. New strategies, policies, objectives and plans will have to be devised to effect the complete transformation. The enterprise shall search for the appropriate technology and workflows to setup the transformed system. The company shall benchmark its existing system with that of another similar company which has already applied reengineering in its system. The company shall seek help from IT consultants to bring in the right infrastructure and IT solutions.
Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2011
Categories: Business and Management, Information Management, Organizational Change, Process Improvement, Reengineering, Strategic Planning Tags:
What is Re-engineering? Why companies are doing re-engineering?
Re-engineering or Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) is way of rethinking or redesigning the existing business systems both in technical and behavioral terms. The ultimate goal of BPR is to continuously improve the business process cycles so that a total quality is built to the business system, its processes & workflows that reflects as high quality products & services produced by the enterprise. As quality products and services are provided by the enterprise for its customers, customers are able to gain value for the products and services that they buy. This improves customer satisfaction and customer orders. This further improves cash flows and easy realization of business profits and gains.
Now, since BPR leads to continuous business process improvements, the business process cycles and workflows are continuously refined according to changing strategies, technologies and customer demands. This ultimately leads to business stability in the competitive industry / business environment. Since every enterprise is striving for business stability, everyone is going for BPR.
BPR involves considering everything from business strategies to processes to organization structures to management systems (people, machine, money, information) to values & beliefs of the enterprise that undergoes BPR.
Copyright (c). www.getallarticles.com – 2011
Categories: Business and Management, Enterprise Architecture, Reengineering, Strategic Planning Tags:
Sample Project Management problem resolution
Project description: Project for xyz that included development, maintenance and enhancements to the official web site and web-based intranet applications that supported integrated work flows within various departments. I was leading a team of team members including developers, web-designer and Mr X.
Communication Issue: During my tenure leading the project, I have encountered situations where I had to study and resolve conflicts that arise from communication issues. There was this team member X, who was very zealous and enthusiast about the job that he does. He was so multifaceted that he was put into parallel tasks such as HTML web page design, customer support and user training. Lately, there were many issues that came up since Mr. X was very aggressive while dealing with people at the client departments, where he was supposed to communicate politely and more responsive to user questions and call for support. This caused severe conflicts and constraints in project progress. There was constant delays in User acceptance tests (UAT) and final user approvals before the product can be delivered and deployed. All in all, this trailed the project hours, increased the operational expenses to work extra hours and delayed the project turnaround time.
How it could be resolved: I would like to use the ‘Confrontation’ method to resolve the issue, which would target at problem resolution and creating a win-win situation for Mr X., project and the project stakeholders. I would see how I could utilize Mr. X’s skills more efficiently in some other area and fill his position with a cheaper resource who will just do UATs and trainings and who can be more patient and understanding while doing the UATs and training. This way, I can satisfy his desire to be aggressive, at the same time offer a solution for the users who expect patience and understanding. We would offer Mr. X a position in project sales team where he has chance to utilize his aggressive nature and his communication skills. This new arrangement of task activities among Mr. X and the new hire will have profound impacts on the project turn around time. The ultimate effect would be – satisfied Mr X. and happy users – thus less conflicts and least project delays.
Note: Actually, this is what happened in real time. I didn’t know what kind of formal conflict resolution I was using to solve the communication issue. But, now I know. Another big indirect impact of applying this conflict resolution was that Mr X., now working in sales team, started bringing in new projects utilizing his sales skills, which was rather unnoticed.
Categories: Business and Management, Hi-Tech Workers, Information Management, Knowledge Management, Process Improvement, Project Management, Strategic Planning Tags:
Strategic alignment of IT resources – A case study in Grocery industry (Part 2)
Strategic alignment of IT resources – A case study in Grocery industry (Part 2)
|
Japan |
UK |
Spain |
US |
|
|
Effect of economic situation |
The effect of recession has prompted Japanese to be |
Consumers have scaled back spending and repaid debt |
Recession has its impacts on buying habits on |
Currently, there is high trends |
|
Technology & Infrastructure Issues |
Concerns that old style of doing business is not |
Robust private markets for technology and services. |
Innovation system |
Major technology thrust pushes industry to take |
|
Integration Issues |
System integration issues due to heavy mergers |
Applications developers must understand retailers’ |
Severe integration issues in supply chain. |
Major challenge is integration issues while |
|
Japan |
UK |
Spain |
US |
|
|
Political Structure |
A parliamentary government with a constitutional |
Constitutional monarchy and Commonwealth realm (50). |
Basque Nationalist Party , Canarian Convergence and |
Even though current US political setup and |
|
Legislation |
In 2006, the Internet providers attempted to |
Growing dominance of large grocery chains prompted |
Education expenditures |
Current US administration has put forth various |
|
Trade Policy |
Japan’s weighted average tariff rate was 1.3 percent |
The Bank of England periodically coordinates |
Spain’s trade policy |
US trade policies are designed to support grocery |
Porter’s Competitive Forces Model
Dominant Blueprints & Strategic Focus
Blueprint (Drivers & Constraints)
|
Blueprint |
Force |
Japan |
UK |
Spain |
US |
|
Multi-Channel Easy To Do Business With |
Driver |
Acquisition |
Growing |
Efficiency |
Technology/Innovation |
|
Constraint |
Shortage |
Ordering |
Today, |
Convincing |
|
|
Spend Management Low Cost |
Driver |
The |
Spend |
Spend |
Economic |
|
Constraint |
Recession |
Cash |
Mega-Hubs were launched with promise to provide |
Walmart’s efforts to align IT to |
|
|
Employee
Productivity Multiplier |
Driver |
A |
Respecting |
Integrating |
Increased |
|
Constraint |
Regulations, |
Data Protection Act, |
For |
Severe |
|
Blueprint |
Force |
Japan |
UK |
Spain |
US |
|
Supply Management Fast & Responsive Service |
Driver |
The smaller supermarket chains around the country |
Tesco uses RFID tags on milk and DVDs to track |
Grocery retailers such as Asda |
Early |
|
Constraint |
focused (42).
|
Shorter order times, faster payment, interaction by |
ERP does not as of yet have a dominant industry |
The |
|
|
Product Innovation Product Innovation |
Driver |
Health is a key factor in determining customers’ |
Introducing private label goods as a way to provide |
CAD application resulted in an explosion of digital increasingly difficult to effectively |
One |
|
Constraint |
According to GNX’s VP of |
Grocery stores can provide aggregated customer data |
By the 1990’s, industry demanded more sophisticated |
Full |
Countries Position in Blueprint Evolution
Summaries, Interpretations, and Lessons Learned
•Customer’s are time-consciousness and demand power to establish preferences and satisfaction level has an ever increasing influence on the development and acceptance of multi-channel blueprints.
•Spend management is an essential dimension in business intelligence solutions, enabling better visibility into factors influencing strategic decisions.
•Leading grocery companies have invested enormous time and capital into aligning IT and business processes by standardizing applications.
•Retailers in the grocery industry search for innovative and efficient ways to integrate and standardize supply chain management by leveraging available IT resources to reinforce their business processes.
Conclusion
•Technology and innovation infusion has a positive impact on companies to quickly devise methods to establish effective means to perform sales promotions, improve customer service, provide easier and efficient tracking of products and supply chain management, and cut across multiple channels.
•Leading grocery retailers are distinguished by their significant attention to—and investment in—aligning people, processes and technology.
•To gain competitive advantage, retailers, manufacturers and wholesalers look for ways to reduce costs and improve response time by improving and standardizing their business processes.
•The major influences in the usage of product innovation blueprint are brand focus & subsequent differentiation and the strive towards effective means of product life cycle visualizations and subsequent IT alignment in satisfying a powerful customer.
References
. Gottlieb M. S. (2006). Grocery Stores- An Industry Study. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://www.msgcpa.com/files/Grocery.pdf.
2. Martinez S., Kaufman P. (n.d.) Twenty Years of Competition Reshape the U.S. Food Marketing System. Retrieved on February 14, 2010 from http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/April08/Features/FoodMarketing.htm.
3. SAS.com. (2008). SAS® Solutions for the grocery industry. Retrieved on February 14, 2010 from
http://www.sas.com/resources/brochure/sas-solutions-for-grocery-industry-overview.pdf.
4. Carlo J. (2009). Supermarket Pharmacy Trends. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://www.gmdc.org/assets/pdf/hbw09_business_session_supermarket_pharmacy_trends.pdf.
5. PollackAssociates (2002). Supermarket Technology. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://www.supermarketalert.com/pdf%20docs/2Techology.pdf.
6. Innovation America (2009). New Model of Governance of American Innovation. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.innovationamerica.us/index.php/inthenews/bendis-ia-in-the-news/1191-new-model-of-governance-of-american-Innovation.
7. Neilson News. (2009). New Product Innovation In A Recession: More Challenges, But Opportunities Remain. Retrieved on April15th from
8. cspa.org (2010). Industry Calls on Congress for Stakeholder Process to Modernize Outdated Chemical Law. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.cspa.org/infocenter/2010/03/industry-calls-on-congress-for-stakeholder-process-to-modernize-outdated-chemical-law/.
9. Mangaraj S. and Senauer B. (2008). A segmentation analysis of US grocery stores. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/14328/1/tr01-08.pdf
10. Imlay T. (May, 2006). Challenges in Today’s U.S. Supermarket Industry. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
. Martinez S., Kaufman P. (n.d.) Twenty Years of Competition Reshape the U.S. Food Marketing System. Retrieved on February 14, 20 from http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/April08/Features/FoodMarketing.htm
12. Kaarst-Brown M.L. (2005). Understanding an organization’s view of the CIO: The role of assumptions about IT. MIS Quarterly Executive
Vol. 4 No. 2 / June 2005
13. Pearlson K. E., Saunders C.S. (2008). Managing and using information systems. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
14. Kalakota R., Robinson M. (2003). services Blueprint – Road map for execution. Addison Wesly
15. Puciarelli J.C. (n.d.) Coping with the ” New Normal” ― How the Changed Economy Is Shaping IT Practices. on March 5th from
http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/ content/assets/newnormal.pdf
16. Andreine, D. (2008, October). Multi-Channel Integration Strategies and Environmental Aspects: A Conceptual Framework In Retailing.
Retrieved on 25th Feb, from http://www.gcbe.us/8th_GCBE/data/Daniela%20Andreini.doc
17. sas.com (n.d.). SAS solutions for Grocery Industry. Retrieved on 25 February 2010 from http://www.sas.com/resources/brochure/sas-solutions-for-grocery-industry-overview.pdf.
18. Zahey, D.L. (n.d.). Challenges and Solutions in Multi Channel Retailing. Retrieved on 25 February 2010 from http://www.junctionsolutions.com/programs/Challenges.pdf.
19. Carlo J. (2009). Supermarket Pharmacy Trends. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://www.gmdc.org/assets/pdf/hbw09_business_session_supermarket_pharmacy_trends.pdf.
20. Slovenia, B. (2004, June). Developing a framework for multi-channel strategies – An analysis of cases from the Grocery Retail Industry. Retrieved on 25th Feb, from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/2365947/Developing-A-Framework-For-Multi-Channel-Strategies-%EF%BF%BD-An- Analysis
21. PayStreamAdvisors (2010). Retrieved on March 5th from http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/content/assets/whitepaper_
eINV-Adoption-Ariba_673.pdf
. Gottlieb M. S. (2006). Grocery Stores- An Industry Study. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://www.msgcpa.com/files/Grocery.pdf.
2. Martinez S., Kaufman P. (n.d.) Twenty Years of Competition Reshape the U.S. Food Marketing System. Retrieved on February 14, 2010 from http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/April08/Features/FoodMarketing.htm.
3. SAS.com. (2008). SAS® Solutions for the grocery industry. Retrieved on February 14, 2010 from
http://www.sas.com/resources/brochure/sas-solutions-for-grocery-industry-overview.pdf.
4. Carlo J. (2009). Supermarket Pharmacy Trends. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://www.gmdc.org/assets/pdf/hbw09_business_session_supermarket_pharmacy_trends.pdf.
5. PollackAssociates (2002). Supermarket Technology. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://www.supermarketalert.com/pdf%20docs/2Techology.pdf.
6. Innovation America (2009). New Model of Governance of American Innovation. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.innovationamerica.us/index.php/inthenews/bendis-ia-in-the-news/1191-new-model-of-governance-of-american-Innovation.
7. Neilson News. (2009). New Product Innovation In A Recession: More Challenges, But Opportunities Remain. Retrieved on April15th from
8. cspa.org (2010). Industry Calls on Congress for Stakeholder Process to Modernize Outdated Chemical Law. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.cspa.org/infocenter/2010/03/industry-calls-on-congress-for-stakeholder-process-to-modernize-outdated-chemical-law/.
9. Mangaraj S. and Senauer B. (2008). A segmentation analysis of US grocery stores. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/14328/1/tr01-08.pdf
10. Imlay T. (May, 2006). Challenges in Today’s U.S. Supermarket Industry. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479076.aspx
. Martinez S., Kaufman P. (n.d.) Twenty Years of Competition Reshape the U.S. Food Marketing System. Retrieved on February 14, 20 from http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/April08/Features/FoodMarketing.htm
12. Kaarst-Brown M.L. (2005). Understanding an organization’s view of the CIO: The role of assumptions about IT. MIS Quarterly Executive
Vol. 4 No. 2 / June 2005
13. Pearlson K. E., Saunders C.S. (2008). Managing and using information systems. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
14. Kalakota R., Robinson M. (2003). services Blueprint – Road map for execution. Addison Wesly
15. Puciarelli J.C. (n.d.) Coping with the ” New Normal” ― How the Changed Economy Is Shaping IT Practices. on March 5th from
http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/ content/assets/newnormal.pdf
16. Andreine, D. (2008, October). Multi-Channel Integration Strategies and Environmental Aspects: A Conceptual Framework In Retailing.
Retrieved on 25th Feb, from http://www.gcbe.us/8th_GCBE/data/Daniela%20Andreini.doc
17. sas.com (n.d.). SAS solutions for Grocery Industry. Retrieved on 25 February 2010 from http://www.sas.com/resources/brochure/sas-solutions-for-grocery-industry-overview.pdf.
18. Zahey, D.L. (n.d.). Challenges and Solutions in Multi Channel Retailing. Retrieved on 25 February 2010 from http://www.junctionsolutions.com/programs/Challenges.pdf.
19. Carlo J. (2009). Supermarket Pharmacy Trends. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://www.gmdc.org/assets/pdf/hbw09_business_session_supermarket_pharmacy_trends.pdf.
20. Slovenia, B. (2004, June). Developing a framework for multi-channel strategies – An analysis of cases from the Grocery Retail Industry. Retrieved on 25th Feb, from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/2365947/Developing-A-Framework-For-Multi-Channel-Strategies-%EF%BF%BD-An- Analysis
21. PayStreamAdvisors (2010). Retrieved on March 5th from http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/content/assets/whitepaper_
eINV-Adoption-Ariba_673.pdf
. Ariba.com (n.d). Next-Generation Spend Analysis: Beyond Commodity Classifications. Retrieved on March 5th from http://www.ariba.com/resourcelibrary/content/assets/NextGenerationSpendAnalysis.pdf
23. Global Sourcing – Story 0904 (March, 2010). News Analysis: Where next for global sourcing? Retrieved on March 5th 2010, from http://www.procurementleaders.com/news/latestnews/0904-walmart-supply-chain/
24. Kiosk.com (n.d). Self-service kiosks for HR. Retrieved on 3rd April, 2010, from http://kiosk.com/downloads/KIOSK_HR_Service.pdf
25. D’Anna J. (2009). Brookshire Grocery Company – Automating and integrating HR processes. Retrieved on 3rd April 2010, from http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=7F248506905550A4188B61FB09F22A39826236B6EA2146527CB725D333B45D7B20ED77191A9627EA6371990543E5A9E6420244DE1870B8B4
26. Browna J.R. et. al. (2005). Supply chain management and the evolution of the “Big Middle”. Journal of retailing.
27. Byrnes J. (2003). Supply Chain Management in a Walmart World. Retrieved on March 26th 2010 from http://web.mit.edu/jlbyrnes/www/pdfs/Supply%20Chain%20Management%20in%20a%20Walmart%20World%20HB
28. Azzato M. (2009). 10 Steps to Maximize Store Brand Growth. Retrieved on April 15th, from http://www.agentrics.com/web/agentrics/10-steps-to-maximize-store-brand-growth2-25-10.
29. Austin N. (2006). Grocery Retail in Aisia-Pacific. Retrieved on 13 Feb, 2010 from http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/Grocery-retailing-in-Asia-Pacific.pdf.
30. Herbig, P. (1995). Marketing Japanese Style. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://www.greenwood.com/catalog/Q009.aspx.
31. Chida, N. (2004). Japan’s Seiyu reinventing itself using Wal-Mart best practices. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FNP/ is_23_43/ai_n8577546/.
32. M2 Presswire (2009). The Global Economic Crisis: The Impact On Consumer Attitudes & Behaviors In Japan. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://www.just-food.com/store/product.aspx?id=79056.
. Rissanen, J. and Viitanen, J. (2001). Report on Japanese Technology Licensing Offices and R&D Intellectual Property Right Issues. Retrieved
February 12, 2010 from http://www.finstitute.gr.jp/science/reports/TLOVALMIS.pdf.
34. CIA.gov (2010). World Fact Book – Japan. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-
35. Ou, G. (2008). Japan’s ISPs agree to ban P2P Pirates. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=1063.
36. . Heritage.org (2010). 2010 Index of Economic Freedom – Japan. Retrieved on April 14, 2010 from http://www.heritage.org/Index/Country/Japan
37. Ogawara, S., Chen, J., Zhang, Q. (2003). Internet Grocery Business in Japan: Current Business Models and Future Trends. Retrieved on
February 13, 2010 from http://barney.gonzaga.edu/~chen/misall/sample_paper_2.pdf
38. Research and Markets: The Latest Japan Food and Drink Report is Available Now.” Business Wire. Business Wire. 2009. Retrieved March 06,
2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-204322114.html
39. Journal of Business Research (2004). Efficient consumer response in Japan Industry concerns, current status, benefits, and barriers to
implementation. Retrieved on February 26, 2009 from
pan.pdf.
40. Ross, Peter. “Human Resource Management in Japan: Changes and Uncertainties.(Book review).” International Journal of Employment Studies.
GROWES Research Group. 2005. Retrieved April 02, 2010 from HighBeam Research:
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-151608804.html
41. Research and Markets: EthicsPoint: Transforming Compliance into Business Process ROI.” Business Wire. Business Wire. 2008.
Retrieved April 02, 2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-177821339.html
42. Dodd, John. “Aeon vs. the trend of Japanese and world retailers: an insider’s look at ERP and how it will help the Japanese retailers fight
back.(Sponsored Section)(Interview).” Japan Inc.. Japan Inc. Communications. 2003. Retrieved March 26, 2010 from HighBeam
Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-108722613.html
43. Thompson, Abby K.; Paul J. Moughan. “Innovation in the foods industry: functional foods.” Innovation: Management, Policy, & Practice. eContent
Management Pty Ltd. 2008. Retrieved April 16, 2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-182614579.html
44. GNX Honored in Prestigious Microsoft EMEA RAD 2004 Award Competition; GNX ProductVine PDM Solution Wins for ‘Best Demonstration of
Scalability’.” PR Newswire. PR Newswire Association LLC. 2004. Retrieved April 16, 2010 from HighBeam Research:
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-124646747.html
45. TNS World Panel (2008). Discounters set more records. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://www.tnsglobal.com/_assets/files/TNS_Market_Research_Market_Share_Nov08.htm.
46. Judge, E. Times Online. Giants may deliver a knockout blow to the high street. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/consumer_affairs/article3372246.
47. Ellis-Chadwick, F. Doherty, N. F., Anastasakis, L. 2007. E-strategy in the UK retail grocery sector: a resource-based analysis. Managing Service
Quality Vol. 17 No. 6. Retrieved on 16 February 2010 from www.emeraldinsight.com/0140-9174.htm.
48. Seager, A. (2010). UK scrapes out of recession but growth figure disappoints City. Guardian. Retrieved on 16 February 2010 from
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/jan/26/uk-recession-over.
49. Office of Government Commerce. About OGC. Retrieved on 16 February 2010 from http://www.ogc.gov.uk/about_OGC.asp.
50. CIA.gov (2010). World Fact Book – UK. Retrieved on 17 April 2010 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/uk.html.
51. Hingley, M. Taylor, S. Ellis, C. (2007). Radio frequency identification tagging: Supplier attitudes to implementation in the grocery retail sector.
Retrieved on 26 February 2010 from http://www.emeraldinsight.com.libezproxy2.syr.edu/10.1108/09590550710820685.
52. Doherty, N., Ellis-Chadwick, F., (2009). Exploring the drivers, scope and perceived success of e-commerce strategies in the UK retail sector.
European Journal of Marketing. Vol. 43 No. 9/10. pp. 1246-1262.
53. Thornbory, G.. (2008). Your secret’s safe with OH. Occupational Health, 60(3), 29-31. Retrieved April 3, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global.
(Document ID: 1453081561).
54. Powanga, M., & Powanga, L.. (2008). Deploying RFID in Logistics: Criteria and Best Practices and Issues. The Business Review, Cambridge,
9(2), 1-10. Retrieved March 27, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1617904671).
55. Profit through partnership. (1994). Logistics Information Management, 7(3), 41. Retrieved March 5, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global.
(Document: 880948).
56. Dairy Farmer. Handley prepares to man the barricades! (2008). Retrieved March 7, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry.
(Document ID: 1558834721).
57. Bia. B (2010). Irish Food Board. Spanish Market Overview. Retrieved on February 13,2010 from
58. Ivory Research (2010). Strategic Management of Supermarkets. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from
http://www.ivoryresearch.com/sample5.php.
59. Kamel. M. et al. (2008). Bain Brief. Finding Growth in Europe’s Shifting Grocery Landscape. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from
http://www.bain.com/bainweb/LocalOffices/in_the_news_detail.asp.
60. researchandmarkets.com (2009). The Global Economic Crisis: The Impact On Consumer Attitudes & Behaviors In Spain. Retrieved on
February 13, 2010 from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reportinfo.asp?rfm=rss&report_id=1056342.
61. Muñoz, E., Espinosa de los, J. and Diaz, V. (2000). Innovation Policy in Spain. Technology, innovation and economy in Spain: National and
regional influences. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://www.iesam.csic.es/doctrab1/dt-0003.pdf.
62. Competition Commission. (2006). This independent body issues recommendations on legislation to protect competition in various UK industries.
Retrieved on 17 April 2010 from http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/inquiries/ref2006/grocery/provisional_decision_remedies.htm.
63. state.gov (2009). Background Note: Spain. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2878.htm.
64. Socolovsky, J. (2005). Religious Education Issues Divide Spain. Retrieved on February 13, 2010 from
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5028521.
. Lavazza Selects ATG to Consolidate Multiple Sites Into Unified, Global Portal; ATG Enterprise Portal Suite Unites New B2B, B2C, and B2E
Initiatives. Business Wire. 2002. HighBeam Research. Retrieved on 27 February 2010 from http://www.highbeam.com.
67. Watson, Elaine. “The hub lines: B2B exchanges must make strides in supply chain services if they’re to realise their grand designs. (clicks not
bricks).” Grocer. William Reed Ltd. 2002. HighBeam Research. 8 Mar. 2010 http://www.highbeam.com
68. ARINSO International to focus on Managed Payroll Services as part of European outsourcing strategy; Conor Gallagher joins from LogicaCMG to
lead initiative.” M2 Presswire. M2 Communications Ltd. 2003. Retrieved April 01, 2010 from HighBeam
Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-104875127.html
69. Boom time for outsourced logistics business; Enterprise expenditure on third-party logistics providers set to increase significantly. M2 Presswire.
M2 Communications Ltd. 2006. Retrieved March 27, 2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-141005595.html
70. Rondeau, Patrick J.; Lewis A. Litteral. Evolution of manufacturing planning and control systems: from reorder point to enterprise resources
planning. Production & Inventory Management Journal. American Production and Inventory Control Society Inc. 2001.
Retrieved March 27, 2010 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-83045565.html
71. CIMData (2003). PDM to PLM: Growth of An Industry. Retrieved on April 15, 2010 from
http://www.e-nea.com/servicios/documentacion/PDM%20to%20PLM%20-%20Growth%20of%20An%20Industry%20-
%20March%202003.pdf.
72. Santella (2008). Retailer and FSP. Shopper and Retailer Articles. Retreived 27 April 2010 from
hhttp://www.santella.com/frequent.htm#SUPERMARKET%20FACTS%20-%20INDUSTRY%20OVERVIEW%2020
73. Goodman A. (1996). New York Times. International Business. Small Family-Run Stores in Spain Are Fighting to Limit the Hypermarkets.
Retrieved on 27 February 2010 from http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/06/business/international-business-small-family-run-stores-spain-are-
fighting-limit.html
Categories: Business and Management, Database Technologies, Enterprise Architecture, Information Architecture, Information Management, Process Improvement, Reengineering, Strategic Planning, Uncategorized Tags:
e-Government transformation in Maharashtra, India
The scalar transformation of e-government implementation models in the state of Maharashtra, India, took place exactly as West pictures as billboard, partial service delivery and Portal stage (with major focus on service delivery). The e-government initiative took its shape during late nineties with my employer being appointed as the Apex consultant to the state government to implement all its e-government initiatives including G2G and G2C interactions.
The initial focus was bringing improvements within the government systems (building transversal systems as Shark puts it) and creating intra-department WAN network (satellite based). So the initial focus on implementing e-government initiatives was to build the base for the administrative back office systems to improve existing bureaucratic processes and how departments interacted between themselves to improve their efficiency. During this stage, the initial billboard based, citizen facing website was published which included static information about government, its official and their contacts, major announcements, major government resolutions (GRs), tenders and other relevant information – all downloadable as html/pdf/doc format.
During the time period from 2002-2006, saw a combined era of service delivery and portal stage where the internal transversal systems were integrated with the new e-government portal and more citizen involvement and service delivery was implemented. For example the Document Journey Management System (DJMS, which now manages inter and intra-department work flow) was integrated to the portal so that citizens can directly make avail of particular services and post their feedbacks and grievances. The information posted on the website is delivered to the DJMS system at the same instant via XML data exchange and the department official is notified of the change in document status and seeks for action in the document journey to the next level of hierarchy.
I would say that the socio-political and cultural aspects of the state have a great impact on the level of transformation that occurred throughout the period of 7-8 years until its current state. The major positive impacts were from government grants to support renewed IT infrastructure and opening of separate IT department for state headquartered at Churchgate, Mumbai. The IT department had separate IT secretary, Under Secretary and Director to just look after IT. Their goal was to make Maharashtra the leader in e-governance within the country and at the same time utilize state of the art technology to link government with citizens. Political power and ability to shape technology usage is high, but is rather competing with other states to ponder innovative technologies. This competition has played a major role in creating specific benchmarks and level of competency in e-government expertise across the states and there is constant support from central government for all IT initiatives.
Article copyright (c) 2010 – 2020 – Deepesh Joseph (deepeshjoseph@yahoo.com)
Categories: E-Governance, Information Management, Process Improvement, Strategic Planning Tags:
Will Rohr’s secular writings about Government change in the present?
If Rohr would have written his book in the present year, it would have a clear shift from the focus on defining what a perfect public administrative function is (which focused on employees themselves) to defining how a public administration be made more fruitful in satisfying the original essence of Constitution to bring about effective administration through active citizen (not just the employees, but all common citizens) collaboration and involvement. There would be clear impact of current high tech and collaborative technology on his view points on how administrative functions may be shared and collaboratively functioned to bring about transparent governance.
Rather than concentrating on separation of powers or mingling of powers or executive leadership and its center of power, he would have focused on issues of how to link citizens more freely to government information sources and its functions to reduce federal bureaucracy and make governance more open, not vested within lobbyists or specific parties within government. He would thus have been able to more clearly expose what does ‘for the people’ actual means in this technology era.
Bibliography:
1. Rohr J. A. (1986). To Run a Constitution – The Legitimacy of the Administrative State. Chapters 1-4, 9-11. University Press of Kansas
2. Ed. By Lathrop D., Ruma L. (2010). Open Government – Collaboration, Transparency and Participation in Practice. Chapters 3-6. O’Reilly Media Inc.
Article copyright (c) 2010 – 2020 – Deepesh Joseph (deepeshjoseph@yahoo.com)
Categories: Business and Management, E-Governance, Information Management, Legal Issues in Information Management, Patents, Strategic Planning Tags:
Categories: Business and Management, E-Governance, Finance Management, Strategic Planning Tags:
CIO’s need to know organizational assumptions about IT
Though Information Technology (IT) is seen as a core enabler of business continuity and competence, it is not always viewed so. I was impressed by a research paper in MIS quarterly by Michelle L. Kaarst Brown. Her research study (Kaarst-Brown M.L ) done in the referenced paper finds that the state of assumptions about IT could be arrived (in any organization) at as in terms of control over IT, central aspect of IT as to business strategy, value tag on IT knowledge and skills as seen by business people, factors and results of IT justification process and who ultimately gains or loses from the IT deployment (Kaarst-Brown M.L.). It is essential for any CIO to understand these assumptions and ‘IT clusters’ that it created within the organization so that he could influence strategic management of IT aligned with business strategy. The review presented here is just a high level synopsis of the paper to introduce the paper to larger audience.
One of the major reasons that acts as an obstacle to effective relationship between IT and business is that when business executive think that IT is just a supporting factor and business comes in “status” above IT. Due to this CIOs are not given proper representation in strategic meetings and thus are not able to do full justice to their core duty – aligning IT strategy with business strategy and in that process lead to strategic management of information resources.
The assumptions as listed above are to be thought and reflected deeply to arrive at various stages/levels of situation that actually persist in an organization. For example, when we reflect on central aspect of IT as to business strategy, we may arrive at the conclusion that IT actually is a core aspect of corporate strategy. In organizations that hold this view, the CIO is well accepted among the business executives and IT has a significant control and influence over the business. In other cases such as when IT is constantly scrutinized for its justification (as when IT is considered as a necessary evil), the CIO’s status is much lowered to someone who has to defend the usage of a particular technology and is not well accepted into the business.
The core of this review is that CIOs in any time in past future has to understand the implications of these assumptions that lay down the company culture and should take appropriate actions to influence the wave towards acceptance of IT as partner of business.
Reference:
Kaarst-Brown M.L. (2005). Understanding an organization’s view of the CIO: The role of assumptions about IT. MIS Quarterly Executive Vol. 4 No. 2 / June 2005
Categories: Information Management, Organizational Change, Process Improvement, Strategic Planning Tags:
Shaping global business strategy based on cultural determinants
This article is based on a research paper that I reviewed recently as included in the reference section. The focus of this article is to draw the importance of cultural influences on global strategic positioning of any company/industry. Through his research oriented paper, author Tay H. K. has done a good job in analyzing the current and emerging auto market in the global arena and gives some good advice that I think could be generalized to attain global strategic positioning for any industry that wishes to remain competitive in the global market.
The author paints the current state of auto industry in major countries such as US, Japan, Europe, China and India and tries to compare these industries to show why a particular country is a leader and how strong is the influence of culture on over all business strategic positioning within the country and globally. As as example, it is said that US has a tradition of basing NPV based methods for finance management for fast profits and quarterly results, focusing somewhat on improving stakeholder’s stock options. This was particularly noted in the auto industry and this cultural influence has severely undermined the growth potential of the industry when other countries like Japan excel. Many auto companies resorted to ‘adversarial supplier relationships, which resulted in ‘zero sum’ game. Also many opted for ‘big-bang’ ideas (eg: extensive portal based solutions) just for the sake of technology boom, which resulted in huge losses (eg: e-GM which cost huge money for GM).
Japanese on the other hand is deep rooted on ‘collectiveness’, ‘frugality’ and ‘resourcefulness’ does not put business profit as primary target, but objectives such as ‘collective is bigger than individual benefits’, ‘life-long devotion for perfection and quality’ and frugality even in times of adversity. Their methods of ‘custodian’ leadership, ‘Kaizen’ model, and management by consensus is very effective which created very impressing results in the industry, both locally and globally.
This strong cultural influence has lead to strong strategic positioning where Japanese automobiles are considered as one of the high quality. Basing on their strong cultural foundation, they were able to attain strong markets globally – US, Europe, China etc. Europe is said to be centered on its cultural influence of strong affinity for engineering perfection and high quality models at high prices. Cultural factors such as shorter work periods, more generous employee benefits and worker job protection – resulted in business models with less margins and are easily affected by emerging players.
Similar studies in China and India shows that there are emerging players and each of them base their business models on their specific cultural setups and are equally competent. But, when these players go out to establish their regimes globally, they should understand the impact of cultural setups and what changes they need to make within their own business process so that they could remain strategic. Author lays down some good advice, which I summarize as follows -
Company should foster a common culture, which I see should be global enough to combine and control global design, manufacture, operations and other business functions. Focus on business maturity, stability rather than on monetary advantage of stakeholders. Support value generating strategic initiatives rather than concentrating ‘quarterly financial report’. Identify world players and form world class benchmarks. eg: consider emerging players like China and India. Follow ‘produce where you sell’ concept, which has long term impacts to fine tune value chains. Build global supplier partnerships. Proactively work with government and policy makers to influence local and global policy-making – Tough job, but is required to create a culture which gives global strategic positioning for the organization.
Reference:
The article is based on review of paper as referred below -
(c) Tay H. K. (2007). Rethinking competition in the world auto market: cultural determinants, strategic implications and game rules. Retreived on February, 2010 from http://www.htayassociates.com/resources/Cultural+Determinants+of+the+21st+Century+Automotive+World+Order+HTAYASSOCIATES+2007.pdf
Categories: Business and Management, Global Strategic Positioning, Organizational Change, Reengineering, Strategic Planning Tags:


